Message-
From: Allen S. Rout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 9:20 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Lots of newbie questions
>> On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:34:49 -0500, Troy Frank
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Where would you draw the
We don't have 7 year retentions but we do have a process that does a
'move data' on any tape that was last written over a year ago.
David
>>> "Allen S. Rout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 8/16/2006 10:20:10 AM >>>
>> On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:34:49 -0500, Troy Frank
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Where would y
>> On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:34:49 -0500, Troy Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Where would you draw the line with this? For monthly snapshots,
> you're saying it works better than archives/backupsets. Would you
> also extend this to replacing yearly archives that need to be around
> 7 years? I
Where would you draw the line with this? For monthly snapshots, you're
saying it works better than archives/backupsets. Would you also extend
this to replacing yearly archives that need to be around 7 years? I
don't see why not, but I've not spent as much time mulling it over as
you probably hav
>> On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:04:11 -0500, Dave Mussulman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Any opinion on archives vs. backupsets for a monthly snapshot kept for 6
> months?
Yes; E) None of the above.
If you want a monthly snapshot, define a new devclass, with different
retention parameters; perhaps:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 09:29:26AM -0400, Allen S. Rout wrote:
> Said from another direction, TSM doesn't worry about selecting only
> backed-up data from a stgpool when it's migrating, it takes whatever
> is there.
Thanks for the clarification.
> > Best practice-wise, do you try to define diffe
>> On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:07:17 -0600, Andrew Raibeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Allen Rout wrote, in part:
>> Reminds me of the first time I checked all of the volumes in a
>> copystgpool out of my library. "Just this once", I thought. But once
>> you're there in the back seat Uh. Digress
Allen Rout wrote, in part:
> Reminds me of the first time I checked all of the volumes in a
> copystgpool out of my library. "Just this once", I thought. But once
> you're there in the back seat Uh. Digression.
Why do you always leave out the *good* parts of your stories! :-)
Andy Raibe
>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:10:09 -0500, Dave Mussulman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I do my backups to a DISK pool that has a 85/40 migrate percentage and a
> tape next storage pool. If everything (my disk and tape pool) is synced
> up to my copypool before a backup runs, and the backup only goes
Hello,
Forgive the laundry list of questions, but here's a few things as a
newbie I don't quite understand. Each paragraph is a different
question/topic, so feel free to chime in on just a few or any that
you're comfortable answering. Thanks!
I'm using Operational Reporting with the automatic n
10 matches
Mail list logo