NAS vs traditional fileservers

2010-06-23 Thread Schaub, Steve
We currently use traditional windows fileservers, but are being presented with an opportunity to start using a NAS device. I've been reading up on NDMP, doesn't sound to me like NAS is the backup admin's friend. Can anyone who has gone down this road share any of the biggest pros/cons/gotchas?

Re: NAS vs traditional fileservers

2010-06-23 Thread Cameron Hanover
We've been backing up one NAS system with NDMP filer-to-server for about 2 years now, it's currently at around 16TB. In our particular setup, we rely on backups fitting on disk before going to tape. As such, we've had to size the disk pool for that client to match the NAS size. We hit a

Re: NAS vs traditional fileservers

2010-06-23 Thread Richard Rhodes
We are in the same situation - possibly changing from Win Servers (using some kind of microsoft replication) with BA client backups to NAS systems . . .about +20tb of data also. So I'm also interested in any comments. I've been reading the vendor manuals, TSM doc's and Redbooks, this mailing

Re: NAS vs traditional fileservers

2010-06-23 Thread Prather, Wanda
, 2010 12:29 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] NAS vs traditional fileservers We are in the same situation - possibly changing from Win Servers (using some kind of microsoft replication) with BA client backups to NAS systems . . .about +20tb of data also. So I'm also interested in any

Re: NAS vs traditional fileservers

2010-06-23 Thread Gee, Norman
: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Richard Rhodes Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 9:29 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: NAS vs traditional fileservers We are in the same situation - possibly changing from Win Servers (using some kind of microsoft replication

Re: NAS vs traditional fileservers

2010-06-23 Thread Thomas Kula
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:51:14AM -0500, Prather, Wanda wrote: -I think NDMP is just a bad idea all over, if you don't have SNAPDIFF. You have a backup product with the architecture and capability to a) back up only changed files, b) keep different files with different retention rules, and

Re: NAS vs traditional fileservers

2010-06-23 Thread Sheppard, Sam
-Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Schaub, Steve Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 8:40 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] NAS vs traditional fileservers We currently use traditional windows fileservers, but are being presented

Re: NAS vs traditional fileservers

2010-06-23 Thread Richard Rhodes
: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Dist Stor cc Manager ads...@vm.marist Subject .EDU Re: NAS vs traditional fileservers 06/23/2010 01:04

Re: NAS vs traditional fileservers

2010-06-23 Thread Robert Clark
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] NAS vs traditional fileservers Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU The NAS vendor is recommending that the NAS box both dedup and compress the files on it. This sounds good for space, but I'm thinking that this will cause NDMP backup to take even longer. I'm