> AGI does not need promoting.
Considering
a) how important AGI is
b) how many dev teams seriously work on AGI
c) how many investors are willing to spend good money on AGI R&D
I believe AGI does need promoting. And it's IMO similar with the
immortality research some of the Novamente folks are invo
> > Thanks for the link. I agree that this work is moving
> > in an interesting direction, though I'm afraid that for
> > AGI (and adaptive systems in general), TM may be too
> > low as a level of description --- the conclusions
> > obtained in this kind of work may be correct, but not
> > cons
Great summary of the issue and open questions.
Stefan
On Nov 1, 2007 10:34 AM, Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AGI does not need promoting. AGI could potentially replace all human
> labor,
> currently valued at US $66 trillion per year worldwide. Google has gone
> from
> nothing to th
On 30/10/2007, Pei Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the link. I agree that this work is moving in an
> interesting direction, though I'm afraid that for AGI (and adaptive
> systems in general), TM may be too low as a level of description ---
> the conclusions obtained in this kind of wo
AGI does not need promoting. AGI could potentially replace all human labor,
currently valued at US $66 trillion per year worldwide. Google has gone from
nothing to the fifth biggest company in the U.S. in 10 years by solving just a
little bit of of the AI problem better than its competitors.
We
--- Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aside from Novamente and CYC, who else has attempted to staple
> NLP to a reasoning engine?
Many have tried, such as BASEBALL in 1961 [1] and SHRDLU in 1968-70 [2]. But
you might as well try stapling jello. Natural language evolved on a computer
far
Vladimir: AI that is capable of general learning should be
able to also learn language processing, from the letters up.
Sounds wonderful. Anyone attempting that or even close?
-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go t
Linas,
I don't believe attaching NLP functionality on top of perception
engine can help much. AI that is capable of general learning should be
able to also learn language processing, from the letters up. So it's
just another capability that should be accounted for. NLP can only
help with feeding t
Hi,
Aside from Novamente and CYC, who else has attempted to staple
NLP to a reasoning engine? I just pasted a good NLP parser
I found on the net, onto a home-brew, cut-rate reimplementation
of the CYC reasoning engine. I've got simple things working
(answers "what is X?" questions, and remember
>From a promotional perspective these ideas seem quite weak.
It was an addition to other complex and relatively near future issues
e.g. the longevity and demographic related problems mentioned by
Minsky in his "emergency" presentation.
What are your suggestions?
>AI saving the world .. sounds cra
>From a promotional perspective these ideas seem quite weak. To most
people AI saving the world or destroying it just sounds crackpot (a
cartoon caricature of technology), whereas "helping us to accomplish
our goals" is too vague.
On 31/10/2007, Jiri Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Becau
11 matches
Mail list logo
