ay a sport, ask
> s.o. for novel ideas, spend time with my kid ... and on and on.
>
> The "space thinking" of rationality is superefficient but rigid and useless
> for AGI. The "open world" of the human, creative mind is highly inefficient
> by comparison but superfle
th my kid ... and on and on.
The "space thinking" of rationality is superefficient but rigid and useless for
AGI. The "open world" of the human, creative mind is highly inefficient by
comparison but superflexible and the only way to do AGI.
From: rob levy
Sent: Monday, July 26, 20
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Mike Tintner wrote:
> I think it's v. useful - although I was really extending his idea.
>
> Correct me - but almost no matter what you guys do, (or anyone in AI does)
> , you think in terms of spaces, or frames. Spaces of options. Whether you're
> doing logic, ma
rationalisation -
epitomised in current programming - to create and think in a closed space of
options, wh. is always artificial in nature].
From: rob levy
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 9:16 PM
To: agi
Subject: Re: [agi] The Math Behind Creativity
Not sure how that is useful, or even how it
Not sure how that is useful, or even how it relates to creativity if
considered as an informal description?
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Mike Tintner wrote:
> I came across this, thinking it was going to be an example of maths
> fantasy, but actually it has a rather nice idea about the math
I came across this, thinking it was going to be an example of maths fantasy,
but actually it has a rather nice idea about the mathematics of creativity.
The Math Behind Creativity
By Chuck Scott on June 15, 2010
The Science of Creativity is based on the following mathematica
