I vote AGAINST.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Dec 17, 2017, at 12:02 PM, Corona wrote:
>
> I vote AGAINST as "conditionally" is not rigorously defined and I
> believe that would cause issues.
>
> On 12/10/17, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> I hereby di
I vote AGAINST as "conditionally" is not rigorously defined and I
believe that would cause issues.
On 12/10/17, Aris Merchant wrote:
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> pool. For this decision, th
I vote as follows:
On 2017-12-11 13:03, Aris Merchant wrote:
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
quorum is 7.0, the voting method is AI-
I vote as follows:
> ID Author(s) AITitlePender Pend fee
> ---
> 7993* Alexis 1.0 Conditional Ban Alexis 1 AP
AGAINST.
I was sorely tempted to vote for t
I'm leaning towards voting against, but for now, I vote PRESENT.
On 12/14/2017 9:35 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
I vote AGAINST. Conditionals are a significant convenience, and they make
gameplay more interesting. Removing them should be a last resort. I believe
our precedents should be enough to pr
I vote AGAINST. Conditionals are a significant convenience, and they make
gameplay more interesting. Removing them should be a last resort. I believe
our precedents should be enough to prevent abuse; if not, there is
certainly a less extreme legislative solution.
-Aris
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 4:5
I vote FOR.
On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 at 21:04 Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor,