Sorry about that, I actually had 2-3 process reasons (i.e. in Motions and
Moots processes) that 2 judges at once would break things enough to
violate R217 - I'd written up the first one (probably the weakest as it
relied on grammar alone) but that's where I stalled out for a while (and
delay was
Indeed. For example, the earth is inhabited by a person, to wit, it is
inhabited by Hillary Rodham Clinton (our traditional example
non-player human). It may also be inhabited by other persons, but that
doesn't matter. Technically, I believe this acts as an existential quantifier.
-Aris
On Fri, No
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
R591 contains:
When a CFJ is open and assigned to a judge, that judge CAN assign
a valid judgement to it by announcement, and SHALL do so in a
timely fashion after this becomes possible. If e does not, the
Arbitor CAN remove em from be
3 matches
Mail list logo