On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote:
Keba wrote:
I intend without two objections, to flip the Distributability of my
proposal entitled Perpetuum mobile to distributable.
Received no objections, I do so.
[Damn it, I should have done so yesterday...]
Fails; there is no
Am Dienstag, den 07.09.2010, 09:00 -0400 schrieb Geoffrey Spear:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote:
Keba wrote:
I intend without two objections, to flip the Distributability of my
proposal entitled Perpetuum mobile to distributable.
Received no objections, I do
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 07.09.2010, 09:00 -0400 schrieb Geoffrey Spear:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote:
Keba wrote:
I intend without two objections, to flip the Distributability of my
proposal entitled
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 8:52 PM, com...@gmail.com wrote:
AGAINST unless it's labour
Then it looks like my vote will effectively denounce yours.
—Disagreer Tanner L. Swett
Labour still means work, not worker. May I suggest Undergrad
or Intern?
—Tanner L. Swett
AGAINST unless it's labour
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 29, 2010, at 8:28 PM, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
Labour still means work, not worker. May I suggest Undergrad
or Intern?
—Tanner L. Swett
On 08/29/2010 06:52 PM, com...@gmail.com wrote:
AGAINST unless it's labour
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 29, 2010, at 8:28 PM, Warrigalihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
Labour still means work, not worker. May I suggest Undergrad
or Intern?
—Tanner L. Swett
How about Labor?
-coppro
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
How about Labor?
No opinion.
8 matches
Mail list logo
