comex wrote:
I state under penalty of perjury that the membership of the HP2 agreement
*has* changed since its registration.
Yeah, since we don't have the concept of perjury any more (and actually
it was never applicable in this type of situation) these statements
don't carry the weight that is
Zefram wrote:
Yeah, since we don't have the concept of perjury any more (and actually
it was never applicable in this type of situation) these statements
don't carry the weight that is intended. I think it's unfortunate that
misrepresentation, which had more general utility, has also been
comex wrote:
On Thursday 17 May 2007 11:41 pm, Ed Murphy wrote:
While I'm at it, I state under penalty of perjury that the
membership of the HP2 agreement has not changed since its
registration, thus HP2's existence as a registered player
is not contingent on the outcome of CFJ 1668.
I state
quazie wrote:
his is a mostly complete report from the IADoP.
Because we have more than enough CFJs as it is, you should
probably state explicitly that you're publishing the report
on behalf of IADoP Human Point Two.
While I'm at it, I state under penalty of perjury that the
membership of
4 matches
Mail list logo
