Hi Tim,
Akka fork-join-executor-based dispatchers uses Scala's embedded jsr166
version of FJ.
I don't think it lets you work with FJT though.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Tim Pigden wrote:
> Hi Viktor,
> Ok sorry - I'm not an expert in these matters - apologies for the
> vagueness. I'll do
Hi Viktor,
Ok sorry - I'm not an expert in these matters - apologies for the
vagueness. I'll do some homework and make him read the docs. Dispatcher
looks a good place to start.
--
>> Read the docs: http://akka.io/docs/
>> Check the FAQ:
>> http://doc.akka.io/d
Hmmm, I've reread your question a couple of times and I am not sure what
you are asking, is there something more specific your wonder? (I don't know
what goals you have)
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Tim Pigden wrote:
> hi - yes
>
>
> On 7 January 2015 at 11:32, Viktor Klang wrote:
>
>> Hi T
hi - yes
On 7 January 2015 at 11:32, Viktor Klang wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> is it using ForkJoinTask/RecursiveTask directly?
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Tim Pigden wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> I'm going to be calling some Java multi-threaded code that is currently
>> using JSR166Y (due to backward
Hi Tim,
is it using ForkJoinTask/RecursiveTask directly?
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Tim Pigden wrote:
> Hi
> I'm going to be calling some Java multi-threaded code that is currently
> using JSR166Y (due to backward compatibility requirements with some legacy
> java 6 code).
>
> My Java de
Hi
I'm going to be calling some Java multi-threaded code that is currently
using JSR166Y (due to backward compatibility requirements with some legacy
java 6 code).
My Java developer wants to know if he should do a branch to use java7 (or
8) compatible fork join pool instead
The intention is I
