To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93945
User wg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93945
--- Additional comments from a...@openoffice.org Thu Feb 19 12:06:18 +
2009 ---
There was a build breaker on 64Bit systems caused by forcing long values into
sal
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93945
User wg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93945
User af changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93945
User af changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93945
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 22 12:03:39 +
2008 ---
@af: ah, good catch! That actually explains why dbo's fix for the de-syncing
never
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93945
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 22 08:52:41 +
2008 ---
The time stretching is one of the major problems of issue 94193 but has no big
infl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93945
User thb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93945
User af changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93945
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 20 11:57:47 +
2008 ---
Fixed another part of the problem by preventing repaints as reaction to
attribute c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93945
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 20 11:27:42 +
2008 ---
Reduced the time for painting the table by optimized the construction of Region
obj
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93945
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 20 09:46:31 +
2008 ---
Again, several problems come together:
1) Painting the table takes very long (upwa
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93945
User af changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93945
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 25 13:32:37 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=56843)
A short video showing the corrupted cascade animat
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93945
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 25 13:30:06 +
2008 ---
Alas I installed oo3 rc2 on another machine and got again the "cascade"
animation p
15 matches
Mail list logo