To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66590
User nn changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66590
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 08:19:48 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 77481 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66590
User fst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66590
User fst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66590
User discoleo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66590
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 5 20:58:09 +
2007 ---
The patch implements a more advanced FIND() function with the following
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66590
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 26 09:32:41 -0700
2006 ---
I would rather it returns -1 instead of 0 if the string is not found. In this
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66590
User fst changed the following:
What|Old value |New value