To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81544
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81544
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81544
User fme changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81544
User fme changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81544
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 3 02:47:07 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=51855)
pat
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81544
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 3 02:49:48 +
2008 ---
lijian-fme:
I just submitted my patch2 to issuezilla, because I could log on. :)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81544
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 29 09:23:28 +
2008 ---
fme-lijian: You analysis is correct. But what's puzzling me is the fact that
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81544
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 1 07:40:06 +
2008 ---
fme-lijian: I think we should fix this issue by changing 3. in FindPageDesc()
to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81544
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 28 08:56:01 +
2008 ---
lijian-fme:
I have found a way to solve this problem. Please wait for my patch.
I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81544
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 28 13:07:25 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=51787)
patch file
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81544
User lijian changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81544
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 28 16:01:11 +
2008 ---
fme-lijian: Thank you for your patch! Yes, you found the right piece of code
that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81544
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 29 02:04:26 +
2008 ---
lijian-fme:
I don't know what do you mean by 'some code' case is also correct for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81544
User lijian changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81544
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 27 14:18:15 +
2008 ---
lijian-fme:This issue seems to have no relationship with the insertion of
header.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81544
Issue #|81544
Summary|Page desc changes if header is inserted
Component|Word processor
Version|680m226
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81544
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 13 07:54:00 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=48206)
bugdoc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81544
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 13 07:54:34 +
2007 ---
This is a follow-up of issue 80890.
18 matches
Mail list logo