To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User wg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 9 08:48:38 -0800
2005 ---
hdu:
You are right. After checking with Firefly, it seems that his patch does not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User wg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 7 03:22:48 -0800
2005 ---
The artificial bold in this patch is not done via freetype.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User hdu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User hdu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User hdu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 6 08:16:36 -0800
2005 ---
Wait, I thought the virtual _bold_ style itself depends on freetype = 2.1.10
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 6 08:18:49 -0800
2005 ---
Wait, I thought the virtual _bold_ style itself depends on freetype = 2.1.10
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User wg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User wg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User wg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 5 07:04:28 -0800
2005 ---
I am not sure what's wrong with the screenshot.
Can you upload a screenshot of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User cl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User us changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User us changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 09:45:27 -0800
2005 ---
Re: us, wg
This is very good news indeed that this bug is resolved as fixed,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 16:26:21 -0800
2005 ---
IMO, just remove autohinting, because autohinting usually does bad than good and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 8 01:59:38 -0800
2005 ---
Ok, folks. I have some good news.
Mr. Firefly has filled and signed the JCA
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 3 00:45:14 -0800
2005 ---
More patches are here:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 25 08:04:40 -0700
2005 ---
some comments:
+if (mbUseGamma)
+ mnLoadFlags |=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 25 15:40:48 -0700
2005 ---
SAL_AUTOHINTING_PRIORITY is a environment variable that you can enable/disable
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 18:15:27 -0700
2005 ---
some comments:
+if (mbUseGamma)
+ mnLoadFlags |= FT_LOAD_FORCE_AUTOHINT;
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 20 07:23:10 -0700
2005 ---
-zero0w, thanks for creating that test document ( very nice indeed! :-) ), well
I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User zero0w changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 18 09:20:17 -0700
2005 ---
- npower
IF either/both of you could provide a document(s) with examples of CJK
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 03:57:23 -0700
2005 ---
Confirmed
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User hdu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 09:04:02 -0700
2005 ---
Re: hdu
In the patch there was a small problem with the GlyphCache hashing.
If
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 05:02:17 -0700
2005 ---
If this is no problem we should consider to turn it on for all fonts.
If it is a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 15 07:00:08 -0700
2005 ---
Since my computer motherboard was damaged I was offline for a week.
Ok, let's get
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 11 07:21:16 -0700
2005 ---
Thanks a lot for the nice patch and for the english translations of the
comments.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 10 06:37:44 -0700
2005 ---
- zero0w, fundawang
Hi,
IF either/both of you could provide a document(s) with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 10 06:51:23 -0700
2005 ---
- zero0w, fundawang
Hi,
IF either/both of you could provide a document(s) with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 10 18:39:47 -0700
2005 ---
up,
I hope OO can support bold/italic cjk-font native.:)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User fundawang changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 5 23:27:31 -0700
2005 ---
Attachment#30159 is the patch made by Firefly. As I'm not familiar with way OOo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User zero0w changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 6 02:59:25 -0700
2005 ---
-npower
Due to unknown reason, Firefly's website has down for maintenance?? We'll
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 6 02:55:37 -0700
2005 ---
np-fundawang,zero0w
Thats great, thanks for sourcing the patch, hopefully we can
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User zero0w changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 6 03:49:34 -0700
2005 ---
-fundawang
Great, thanks, hopefully he will be willing to do the jca stuff,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 6 04:24:36 -0700
2005 ---
Ok, this is a small patch comparing to Firefly's previous numerous patches for
OOo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 6 09:36:34 -0700
2005 ---
Continued from my previous comment.
Let me state what this patch does as far
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 6 20:18:02 -0700
2005 ---
I use this patch : openoffice-1.9.m130-vcl-virtualstyle-20050919.patch
to rebuild
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 6 20:18:32 -0700
2005 ---
I use this patch : openoffice-1.9.m130-vcl-virtualstyle-20050919.patch
to rebuild
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 3 01:15:00 -0700
2005 ---
-zero0w
If you are in contact with this guy then could you ask him to sign the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 3 19:59:18 -0700
2005 ---
We need fix this issue soon
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 3 22:47:58 -0700
2005 ---
So bad no italic
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 1 23:43:47 -0700
2005 ---
This is definitely an important issue and should not be ignored by OO.o
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 2 01:28:47 -0700
2005 ---
I've noticed this too
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 2 02:32:53 -0700
2005 ---
I think it's very important for CJK users
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 2 04:13:39 -0700
2005 ---
This patch is very important for Tawian, China , Japan and Korea.
Our desktop
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User st changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 2 07:31:34 -0700
2005 ---
npower:
As far as OpenOffice.org 2.0 is concerned, the printing part is already
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 2 12:21:38 -0700
2005 ---
i think this patch can make OOo a better office software
for everyone. not just
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 1 22:41:11 -0700
2005 ---
Importance
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 07:20:07 -0700
2005 ---
Some comment on this issue:
The GNOME HK developers actually created a LiveCD
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 25 02:38:01 -0700
2005 ---
Hi,
This issue really needs to be fixed if possible, there are many many users
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User npower changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User npower changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 25 02:45:46 -0700
2005 ---
ok forgot to mention, the transformation routines to emulate bold/italic have
been
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 25 02:47:56 -0700
2005 ---
cc' myself
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
64 matches
Mail list logo