Hi,
I have a problem with amverify. Or more correctly, I don't quite see why I
get the output I do:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ amverify bertha-us
No tape changer...
Tape device is /dev/nst0...
Verify summary to amanda
Defects file is /tmp/amanda/amverify.28777/defects
amverify bertha-us
Wed Jun 11
Searching And Still Haven't Found A That Someone Special?
Don't spend another day alone, take your first step towards a better life.
Visit Us Here And Choose The Woman You'd Like Meet
You can browse through our database of pictures and bio's of beautiful Russian womenlooking for a western man just
Hi Bruce,
Use the latest snapshot, it contains mosly bug fix since 2.4.4.
I will release it as 2.4.4p1 before the end of the month.
Jean-Louis
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:10:43AM -0700, Bruce Fletcher wrote:
> I'm about to start setting up Amanda for my LAN, but I'm not sure
> what version to go
in ideal environment you could boot your PC remotly with network boot, that
boots partimage
create a remote disk image and back this file with amanda.
what do you think?
regards,
gregor
I'm about to start setting up Amanda for my LAN, but I'm not sure
what version to go with. I want something stable, but I would
also like to have the option of using RAIT and file: backups,
which I understand to be relatively new features. Should I stick
with the 2.4.4 release from the web site,
That was it. I had diskname and diskdevice screwed up.
thanks
Frank Smith wrote:
--On Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:32:36 -0400 Bill Nolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ext3 and tar
Tar does filesystem-level backup, dump deals with devices. Try
changing your disklist entr
Martin, Jeremy wrote:
I'm not using amanda to back up any Windows boxes, but on some of our
Windows boxes that do need backed up, using NovaNet Web Backup which
does not support backing up the Sytem State like Backup Exec does, I
just use the built in Backup tool to do this. Start / Programs /
Acce
--On Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:32:36 -0400 Bill Nolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ext3 and tar
Tar does filesystem-level backup, dump deals with devices. Try
changing your disklist entry to / (or whatever /dev/hda1 is
mounted as).
Frank
>
> Server - Solaris 8 Client - Red Hat Linux 7.2
>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 12:53:57AM -0500, Mike Eldridge wrote:
>
> they don't *have* 14 tapes. i suppose i'll just have to change
> dumpcycle to 0 and run it weekly. i'll convince them to purchase at
> *least* one additional tape, if not the 14 needed for the cycle.
Mike,
Since I know the folk
Bill Nolf wrote:
ext3 and tar
Frank Smith wrote:
--On Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:16:35 -0400 Bill Nolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Server - Solaris 8 Client - Red Hat Linux 7.2
When I run amcheck -cl normal
I get the following back from the linux client:
ERROR: /dev/hda1 selftest does not
>From: JC Simonetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Have you tried to backup an entire registry and restore it with the regedit
method?
>Because I think of a problem: the registry is composed of data but these data
also have access rights. "regedit" does not display them (whereas "regedt32"
does).
I am
ext3 and tar
Frank Smith wrote:
--On Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:16:35 -0400 Bill Nolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Server - Solaris 8 Client - Red Hat Linux 7.2
When I run amcheck -cl normal
I get the following back from the linux client:
ERROR: /dev/hda1 selftest does not sup
--On Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:16:35 -0400 Bill Nolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Server - Solaris 8 Client - Red Hat Linux 7.2
>
> When I run amcheck -cl normal
>
> I get the following back from the linux client:
>
> ERROR: /dev/hda1 selftest does not support device
> ERROR: /dev/hda1 sendba
> No, they are not viruses, they are batch files written by me
> to backup and restore the Windows registry. But if Windows
> thinks backing up its registry is a virus behavior... ;-)
I'm not using amanda to back up any Windows boxes, but on some of our Windows boxes
that do need backed up, usi
Server - Solaris 8
Client - Red Hat Linux 7.2
When I run amcheck -cl normal
I get the following back from the linux client:
ERROR: /dev/hda1 selftest does not support device
ERROR: /dev/hda1 sendbackup does not support device
.
.
. for each disk partition
ERROR: [BOGUS REQUEST PACKET]
Any idea
i configured chg-zd-mtx, it works ok, besides that does not reall all
parameters from the config file
some parameters are read an some not, strange.
i then modified the cgh-zd-mtx directly and it works ok, but it would be
nicer if it reads the config file
properly.
regards,
gregor
Oh... It seems that "tar" files are also refused by Norton Antivirus.
At this point I won't rename my files with "txt" or "png" extension or anything that
could go through your AV, and/or tar/gzip/dd them, I give up. Sorry... Consider
revising your antivirus parameters, guys...
On Wed, 11 Jun 2
Gene Heskett wrote:
Somewhat interesting Paul, I got the attachments from JC here, and
they were not impeded by something called GroupShield. I looked them
over with kwrite and they looked like the real thing. No new bugbear
virii in them, nor any copyright/license notices.
No, those were not
Sorry guys, I would have been aware that Outlook and other Exchange softwares would be
afraid of my previous attachments since they were 2 ".bat" files...
So in case of someone could not get them and would have to get them, I've tar'ed and
reattached them here, just in case.
No, they are not vir
Right, right...
Would be difficult for me to be infected by Windows viruses, since the OS on my
personal computer (the one I'm using right now to send this email) is based on a
2.4.19 linux kernel :-)
But it is also right i should have tar'ed my attachments since I know that Outlook and
maybe Ex
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 09:48:35 -0400 (EDT)
barryc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >JC Simonetti wrote:
> >Thus there is only one way to backup the loaded hives (and only one to restore
> > them): using 2 Windows programs available in the Windows Resource Kit:
> >_ regback.exe
> >_ regrest.exe
> >I cann
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 08:55, Paul Bijnens wrote:
>Just for those that do not know it yet...
>There is a new variant of Bugbear around since last week. I already
>received two messages through the amanda mailing list with the
> virus. The last one was probably from someone who got infected the
>JC Simonetti wrote:
>Thus there is only one way to backup the loaded hives (and only one to restore
> them): using 2 Windows programs available in the Windows Resource Kit:
>_ regback.exe
>_ regrest.exe
>I cannot join them to this mail since they are not free, you will have to buy
> the Resource K
Hello,
I found in this log file an error message of sed.
sendbackup: debug 1 pid 2208 ruid 33 euid 33: start at Wed Jun 11 14:34:40 2003
/usr/local/amanda/libexec/sendbackup: version 2.4.4
parsed request as: program `GNUTAR'
disk `/home/ftp/unix_accounts'
Just for those that do not know it yet...
There is a new variant of Bugbear around since last week. I already
received two messages through the amanda mailing list with the virus.
The last one was probably from someone who got infected the first time.
Update your virus signatures please, or don't
Action Taken:
The attachment was quarantined from the message and replaced with a text
file informing the recipient of the action taken.
To:
Paul Bijnens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From:
JC Simonetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
Action Taken:
The attachment was quarantined from the message and replaced with a text
file informing the recipient of the action taken.
To:
Paul Bijnens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From:
JC Simonetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
Hi!
Concerning the backup of the Windows Hives, I've made a brainstorm using MS
documentation (ouch my head). So this is the result.
The Windows Hives are composed of many files:
_ %windir%\system32\cache\* for the system hives
_ ~user\ntuser.dat for the user hive
The system hives are always loade
Hello,
When I did an amdump my_conf, I have a data timeout failed
Here it is my config file :
fext01ft/home/ftp/unix_accounts comp-serveur-tar
fext01ft/etccomp-serveur-tar
After investigation on the client, I looked in the sendsize file d
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 02:31, Joseph Sirucka wrote:
>Hi Gene
>
>thanks for the reply.
>
>the lo interface is up with the 127.0.0.1 ip.
>
>The amandahost files is correct and I am really stuck on what is
> broken.
>
>I have posted a printout of the permissions of my directory incase
> something i
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 01:53, Mike Eldridge wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 05:31:20PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> >> There has to be some reason the services won't start, so please
>> >> post an 'ls -l' of the /usr/local/libexec directory. Also an
>> >> 'ls -l' of the amanda src directory, a
Hi JC,
in a previous post I've reported the same problem in my amanda
installation. I've 2.4.4 client & 2.4.4 server.
No one replied so it seems that only the two of us have this problem.
I hope to see someone else.
Stefano Coletta
http://www.mindcreations.com
JC Simonetti wrote:
Andy Howell wrote:
ln -s '/cygdrive/c/Documents and Settings' /cygdrive/c/DocsAndSettings
did the trick. Recovery works fine as well. Now all I have to do is
figure out some permission problems with some NTUSER.DAT and related
files, and I'll be all set.
Not possible; windows keep these open
Title: Her yastan bay ve bayanlar icin
Her yastan bay ve bayanlar icin:
CiNSEL SORUNLARINIZA
ARTIK SON!
" Kalici ve
Kesin Cozumler"
.
* Ereksiyon Olamama ve
Ereksiyonu Koruyamama
Ted Cabeen wrote:
Ahh. So without a holding disk, amanda will only dump one filesystem
at a time. Got it. Thanks.
How many clients is "lots"?
It's enough to have one slow client, and 1 or more other systems,
and the parallelism of amanda will dump the slow client in parallel
to the rest. That'
Brian Cuttler wrote:
Stupid question, how smart is the rait driver for disk ?
If you put the spool area on the output disk will it juggle
the space ok ? Will it know to move the file from one directory
to another (move the file pointer # mv perhaps) rather than
having to copy all the bits and the
37 matches
Mail list logo
