Thanks for the info Paul (and Jay).
Paul, a few additional questions directed towards your response.
In my experience the compress best uses 4 times as much CPU for only
5% better compression, so it's not worth it, unless you have spare CPU
cycles to burn. Maybe it's better to increase the
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 08:55:16AM -0700, Dege, Robert C. wrote:
Thanks for the info Paul (and Jay).
Paul, a few additional questions directed towards your response.
In my experience the compress best uses 4 times as much CPU for only
5% better compression, so it's not worth it,
System:
RedHat 7.1, kernel 2.4.19
amanda 2.4.2p2, samba 2.2.6
I've been backing up several Windows machines for a while now (months).
Recently, I've been getting cramped with tape space, so I added
compress-client-best to my samba-pc dump type.
However, while watching amanda perform the dump,
Dege, Robert C. wrote:
System:
RedHat 7.1, kernel 2.4.19
amanda 2.4.2p2, samba 2.2.6
I've been backing up several Windows machines for a while now (months).
Recently, I've been getting cramped with tape space, so I added
compress-client-best to my samba-pc dump type.
In my experience the compress
