On Wednesday 13 November 2002 13:20, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 04:59:19PM +, Niall O Broin wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 11:14:40AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> > >This is exactly why my nightly backup script, after running
>> > > the amdumps and rewinding/ejecting the ta
On Wednesday 13 November 2002 13:14, Frank Smith wrote:
>--On Wednesday, November 13, 2002 09:49:56 -0700 "Carl D. Blake"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 18:02, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> Greets folks;
>>>
>>> I now have recovered as much as I can, but a couple of things
>>> need
On Wednesday 13 November 2002 11:59, Niall O Broin wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 11:14:40AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> >This is exactly why my nightly backup script, after running the
>> > amdumps and rewinding/ejecting the tapes, tars up all the
>> > amanda config files and directories. That
On Wednesday 13 November 2002 11:49, Carl D. Blake wrote:
>On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 18:02, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Greets folks;
>>
>> I now have recovered as much as I can, but a couple of things
>> need to be said.
>>
>> Not enough emphasis is placed on the fact that tar won't access
>> a file with a
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 01:20:32PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > Nothing to do with the system at all. It's just a little something added
> > into the script which runs amanda each day - I presume at least 95% of
> > amanda users run amanda from a cron driven script. A couple of lines in that
> >
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 11:14:40AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >This is exactly why my nightly backup script, after running the
> > amdumps and rewinding/ejecting the tapes, tars up all the amanda
> > config files and directories. That tar ball then gets put two
> > places (on two separate machi
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 18:02, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> Greets folks;
>
> I now have recovered as much as I can, but a couple of things need
> to be said.
>
> Not enough emphasis is placed on the fact that tar won't access a
> file with any kind of a lock on it, and in the case of amanda, its
>
On Wednesday 13 November 2002 10:06, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 at 8:02pm, Gene Heskett wrote
>
>> Not enough emphasis is placed on the fact that tar won't access
>> a file with any kind of a lock on it, and in the case of amanda,
>> its certainly a fixable problem. I recovere
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 10:06:58AM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> This is exactly why my nightly backup script, after running the amdumps
> and rewinding/ejecting the tapes, tars up all the amanda config files and
> directories. That tar ball then gets put two places (on two separate
> ma
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 at 8:02pm, Gene Heskett wrote
> Not enough emphasis is placed on the fact that tar won't access a
> file with any kind of a lock on it, and in the case of amanda, its
> certainly a fixable problem. I recovered all the indexes and
> curfiles and such but absolutely nothing e
Greets folks;
I now have recovered as much as I can, but a couple of things need
to be said.
Not enough emphasis is placed on the fact that tar won't access a
file with any kind of a lock on it, and in the case of amanda, its
certainly a fixable problem. I recovered all the indexes and
curf
11 matches
Mail list logo
