I am not a constant user of the sats, but I notice this with both some CW
and SSB transmissions.
Some sats just have drift.
It is still fun.
God Bless
R
W4BUE
- Original Message -
From: "Clayton Coleman"
To: "AMSAT-BB"
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 11:42 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb]
On 2/7/2014 11:18 AM, Ng, Peter wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't automatic doppler corrections dynamically
change your frequency to compensate for doppler? Would this mean anyone
engaging in doppler correction are actually drifting into a stable frequency?
by "stable" do you mean
Sent: February 7, 2014 09:27
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Listening on USB when operating CW
On 2/7/2014 11:18 AM, Ng, Peter wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't automatic doppler corrections
> dynamically change your frequency to compensate for doppler?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't automatic doppler corrections dynamically
change your frequency to compensate for doppler? Would this mean anyone
engaging in doppler correction are actually drifting into a stable frequency?
73 Peter ve7ngp
-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
> Behalf Of John Becker
> Sent: February 7, 2014 09:27
> To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Listening on USB when operating CW
>
>
> On 2/7/2014 11:18 AM, Ng,
Clayton,
Lately, as I have been listening a lot more with my FUNcube Dongle
> Pro+, I have observed many CW stations drifting across the satellites'
> passband. I realize this is not a new phenomenon. I would assume
> these drifting stations are NOT using any type of computer Doppler
> correct
Thanks Clayton, that's good to know
73 Peter ve7ngp
-Original Message-
Peter,
That is correct and what I have attempted to describe. A station not adjusting
properly for Doppler shift will appear to "move" across the passband into
stations who are making corrections. (voice or CW
3 and God Bless,
> Tim - N3TL
> Evansville, Ind. - EM68
>
>
> ---- Original Message
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Listening on USB when operating CW
> From: Clayton Coleman
> Date: Fri, February 07, 2014 2:04 pm
> To: "Ng, Peter"
> Cc: "amsat
less,
Tim - N3TL
Evansville, Ind. - EM68
Original Message ----
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Listening on USB when operating CW
From: Clayton Coleman
Date: Fri, February 07, 2014 2:04 pm
To: "Ng, Peter"
Cc: "amsat-bb@amsat.org"
Peter,
That is correct and what I hav
> Many times I have been engaged in a QSO only to have someone CQ'ing on
> CW drift across my existing QSO. Anyone who operates satellites has
> probably had this happen to them many times. Sometimes myself or
> others in QSO may try to tell the CW operator "Hello - QSO in
> progress" but it is a
> Computer-control stations and manual-control stations are adjusting for
> Doppler differently. I have done - and will continue to do - both. In my
> opinion, neither is incorrect; they simply differ from each other.
This was posted during the assemblage of my long winded reply. I think it get
Kevin:
I don't think that the OP was trying to complain about SSB operators being
less capable or less polite or less facile in their Doppler tuning
correction or whatever in comparison to CW operators. He was just making an
observation that sometimes two pairs of communicating operators have
made a lot of "Qs".
God Bless
R
W4BUE
K4AMG.org club
- Original Message -
From:
To: "Kevin M"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2014 12:33 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Listening on USB when operating CW
Kevin:
I don't think that the OP was trying to complain
13 matches
Mail list logo