[amsat-bb] Re: more about the TH-D72A for satellites

2010-12-10 Thread Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
Hi Jeff! > Seems the TH-D72A is pretty much a replica of the TH-D7(A) with some minor > modifications. I'm sure that's what Kenwood was looking for, to keep R&D costs for a new ham HT down, but I think you are getting more than just a minor upgrade to the TH-D7 with the TH-D72. Not much change f

[amsat-bb] Re: more about the TH-D72A for satellites

2010-12-10 Thread Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF
will be little or no weight > on the recepticle at the HT. > > Figured I'd save others from a headache. > > > > 73, > > Jeff WB3JFS > Las Vegas, NV > DM26 > > > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message ----- > From: "P

[amsat-bb] Re: more about the TH-D72A for satellites

2010-12-10 Thread Jeff Yanko
or no weight on the recepticle at the HT. Figured I'd save others from a headache. 73, Jeff WB3JFS Las Vegas, NV DM26 - Original Message - From: "Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)" To: Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 9:57 AM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: more ab

[amsat-bb] Re: more about the TH-D72A for satellites

2010-12-06 Thread Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
Hi Bob! > My understanding is that unlike the THD7, the D72 can only > operate full duplex as noted above RX-A and TX-B.  But either > band can be VHF or UHF, so you can operate mode B or J, but the > TX is always from B. You are 100% correct. I downloaded both D72 manuals from the Kenwood web s

[amsat-bb] Re: more about the TH-D72A for satellites

2010-12-06 Thread Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
Hi Alan! > Great preliminary report.  One question.  I haven't been able to locate the > size of the stock battery.  The accessory is an 1800 MaH battery.  Is that > the typical larger battery, or just a spare the same size?  A friend who is > more interested in the APRS side asked me. There is -

[amsat-bb] Re: more about the TH-D72A for satellites

2010-12-06 Thread Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
Hi Ed! > I'm sure there a lot of us interested in what you find out using the new > radio. Thanks for the encouragement. So far, nobody has told me to keep quiet. ;-) I'm getting more packet and APRS questions in private e-mail, and can't really answer many of them other than the D72 works to

[amsat-bb] Re: more about the TH-D72A for satellites

2010-12-06 Thread Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
Hi Bob! > I, too, have been considering "retiring" my TH-D7A(G), and  you just sold me > on the new Kenwood after our contact on AO-51. Sounded great. Several commented on my audio during the two passes I worked, as well as "selling" them on the new radio. If a bunch of D7s show up for sale, may

[amsat-bb] Re: more about the TH-D72A for satellites

2010-12-06 Thread Bob Herrell
Thanks, Patrick I, too, have been considering "retiring" my TH-D7A(G), and you just sold me on the new Kenwood after our contact on AO-51. Sounded great. Ordered mine from HRO a few minutes ago. Also got the drop in charger. Since they changed battery to a Li-ion, the D7A charger (NiCad) will

[amsat-bb] Re: more about the TH-D72A for satellites

2010-12-06 Thread Robert Bruninga
> ... if the TH-D72 is the true successor to > the TH-D7 including the cross-band full-duplex > I'd take the plunge. > 1. Transmit with VFO B, receive with VFO A. > VFO A has better sensitivity than VFO B, > so why not go with that? There is no > restriction on which VFO can be the TX My und

[amsat-bb] Re: more about the TH-D72A for satellites

2010-12-05 Thread Jim Jerzycke
Thanks, Patrick I've been considering "retiring" my TH-D7, and I think you just sold me on the new Kenwood! 73, Jim KQ6EA On 12/06/2010 04:24 AM, Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK) wrote: > Hi! > > I wavered on whether I was going to get this radio straight away, after > the fiasco (related to FM