Am Samstag, 8. März 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Daniel Isenmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 15:37:24 -0600 "Aaron Griffin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > c) The *only* thing that is appropriate is to autoblacklist them via
> > > modprobe
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Daniel Isenmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 15:37:24 -0600 "Aaron Griffin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > c) The *only* thing that is appropriate is to autoblacklist them via
> > modprobe rules.. Doing it the previous way is absolute crap.
>
>
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 15:37:24 -0600
"Aaron Griffin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 8. März 2008 schrieb Dan McGee:
> >
> >
> > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Aaron Griffin
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Samstag, 8. März 2008 schrieb Dan McGee:
>
>
> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Samstag, 8. März 2008 18:52:53 schrieb Travis Willard:
> > Moved to optdepends usage
>
> Just a side-note: you may use optdpends, but this has no effect on package
> install. So you should not remove the install-mes
Am Samstag, 8. März 2008 18:52:53 schrieb Travis Willard:
> Moved to optdepends usage
Just a side-note: you may use optdpends, but this has no effect on package
install. So you should not remove the install-mesaages atm.
--
archlinux.de
Dan McGee schrieb:
, it's not
possible to block framebuffer loading by udev rules.
Can you please explain why? Thanks.
The current package has the rule
KERNEL=="fb[0-9]*", GOTO="hotplug_driver_loaded"
However, this rule cannot work: At the point where the driver is not
loaded, all you get
Am Samstag, 8. März 2008 schrieb Dan McGee:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Tobias Kieslich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks to Eric we have vi* packages for both architectures and
> > the manpages are fixed. So please sign off.
>
> All look fine to me, signoff i686.
>
>
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Tobias Kieslich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to Eric we have vi* packages for both architectures and the
> manpages are fixed. So please sign off.
All look fine to me, signoff i686.
-Dan
> > no signoff
> > please add the framebuffer blacklist again to load-modules.sh
>
> This is a terrible place for it, as I tried to explain on IRC. We
> should not explicitly block a set of modules here. If we don't want
> them, then why the hell do we even put them in our kernel?
There was a req
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Samstag, 8. März 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
>
>
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:10 AM, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi
> > > version bump please signoff both arches
> > > hdparm-8.6
> > >
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Samstag, 8. März 2008 schrieb Dan McGee:
>
>
> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
Am Samstag, 8. März 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:10 AM, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
> > version bump please signoff both arches
> > hdparm-8.6
> > - add partition safeguards to r/w sector and make_bad_sector
> > hdparm-8.5
> > - f
Am Samstag, 8. März 2008 schrieb Dan McGee:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > Somehow, module loading is considerably faster here than before (even
> > > fast than with
14 matches
Mail list logo
