Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.1.0

2008-01-13 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Samstag, 12. Januar 2008 schrieb Pierre Schmitz: > Am Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2008 04:21:21 schrieb Dan McGee: > > Signoff email for pacman 3.1.0, both architectures. > > signoff (both). I have tested pacman itself and makepkg; no problems so > far. signoff for both arches worked so far, good j

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.1.0

2008-01-12 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2008 04:21:21 schrieb Dan McGee: > Signoff email for pacman 3.1.0, both architectures. signoff (both). I have tested pacman itself and makepkg; no problems so far. -- archlinux.de

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.1.0

2008-01-11 Thread Varun Acharya
On Jan 10, 2008 8:51 AM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Signoff email for pacman 3.1.0, both architectures. > Signed off, x86_64

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.1.0

2008-01-10 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Jan 10, 2008 7:26 AM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan McGee schrieb: > > Signoff email for pacman 3.1.0, both architectures. > > > > I've tested it for i686, not as much for x86_64. > > Signoff for both, upgrade path seems fine. Signed off i686, didn't fully test on x86_64 (but

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.1.0

2008-01-10 Thread Thomas Bächler
Dan McGee schrieb: > Signoff email for pacman 3.1.0, both architectures. > > I've tested it for i686, not as much for x86_64. Signoff for both, upgrade path seems fine. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.1.0

2008-01-10 Thread Damir Perisa
Thursday 10 January 2008, Dan McGee wrote: | Signoff email for pacman 3.1.0, both architectures. | | I've tested it for i686, not as much for x86_64. singing in the rain for x86_64 looks great, - D -- .·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´ °° °

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.1.0

2008-01-09 Thread Eric Belanger
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Travis Willard wrote: On Jan 9, 2008 10:21 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Signoff email for pacman 3.1.0, both architectures. I've tested it for i686, not as much for x86_64. NOTE: this is a signoff email only, and deals with the *packaging* and not the *applica

Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.1.0

2008-01-09 Thread Travis Willard
On Jan 9, 2008 10:21 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Signoff email for pacman 3.1.0, both architectures. > > I've tested it for i686, not as much for x86_64. > > NOTE: this is a signoff email only, and deals with the *packaging* and > not the *application*. This is NOT the place for bugs

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.1.0

2008-01-09 Thread Dan McGee
Signoff email for pacman 3.1.0, both architectures. I've tested it for i686, not as much for x86_64. NOTE: this is a signoff email only, and deals with the *packaging* and not the *application*. This is NOT the place for bugs, issues, etc. Please start a new thread either here or on pacman-dev, o