[arch-general] network error empathy

2011-06-08 Thread Carlos Alberto Ospina
Hi everybody I have trouble connecting to msn through empathy, the other protocols work fine (msn irc facebook), when trying to connect " network error". If someone could help me, thanx from Colombia -- Carlos Alberto Ospina E. Linux User #506652

Re: [arch-general] Reporting for [extra] packages?

2011-06-08 Thread Simon Perry
On 09/06/11, Evangelos Foutras wrote: | "Arch Linux" is the correct project to file this bug under. "Community | Packages" is used exclusively for packages in [community]. Thanks mate, bug created. I've now noticed that when filling out a report you can select the extra repo when classifying the

Re: [arch-general] Reporting for [extra] packages?

2011-06-08 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 9 June 2011 04:03, Simon Perry wrote: > Hi, > > I need to file a bug against unison, which is in the extra repo, and was > wondering whether I just put it under "Arch Linux" or perhaps "Community > Packages" in the bug tracker? "Arch Linux" is the correct project to file this bug under. "Commu

[arch-general] Reporting for [extra] packages?

2011-06-08 Thread Simon Perry
Hi, I need to file a bug against unison, which is in the extra repo, and was wondering whether I just put it under "Arch Linux" or perhaps "Community Packages" in the bug tracker? Cheers. P.S. It looks like it was compiled with the testing repo enabled: % unison --help unison: /lib/libc.so.6: v

Re: [arch-general] Reboot - Versioned Kernel Installs

2011-06-08 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Thu, 9 Jun 2011 06:36:08 +0800 schrieb Oon-Ee Ng : > Such a patch would also have to copy the modules (which aren't under > kernel26's 'purview'). For example, nvidia gets upgraded on a major > version kernel update, the old kernel which has been renamed doesn't > 'work' graphically anymore. J

Re: [arch-general] Reboot - Versioned Kernel Installs

2011-06-08 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote: >> On Wednesday 08 June 2011 15:45:21 Tom Gundersen wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: >>> > If you want this, implement it! I have seen some discussio

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.3-1, net-tools-1.60-16, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2, ypbind-mt-1.33-2, iproute2-2.6.38-3

2011-06-08 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:33 PM, mangust wrote: > On 06/08/2011 04:57 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:17 PM, mangust wrote: >>> On 06/08/2011 01:41 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: Yes, documentation should be updated. Help with this is very much appreciated! I will personal

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.3-1, net-tools-1.60-16, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2, ypbind-mt-1.33-2, iproute2-2.6.38-3

2011-06-08 Thread mangust
On 06/08/2011 04:57 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:17 PM, mangust wrote: >> On 06/08/2011 01:41 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: >>> Yes, documentation should be updated. Help with this is very much >>> appreciated! I will personally start working on this once the release >>> is out (

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.3-1, net-tools-1.60-16, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2, ypbind-mt-1.33-2, iproute2-2.6.38-3

2011-06-08 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 8 June 2011 20:13, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On 9 June 2011 01:57, Rogutės Sparnuotos wrote: >> Or, rather, >> "ip a" for addreses and link status (like /sbin/ifconfig) >> "ip r" for routes (like /sbin/route) > > Nice. If only it displayed RX/TX bytes as well, I would totally not > miss ifcon

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.3-1, net-tools-1.60-16, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2, ypbind-mt-1.33-2, iproute2-2.6.38-3

2011-06-08 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 9 June 2011 01:57, Rogutės Sparnuotos wrote: > Or, rather, > "ip a" for addreses and link status (like /sbin/ifconfig) > "ip r" for routes (like /sbin/route) Nice. If only it displayed RX/TX bytes as well, I would totally not miss ifconfig. :) (*Secretly hopes that someone will point out how

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.3-1, net-tools-1.60-16, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2, ypbind-mt-1.33-2, iproute2-2.6.38-3

2011-06-08 Thread Rogutės Sparnuotos
Tom Gundersen (2011-06-08 16:54): > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Mauro Santos > wrote: > > On 07-06-2011 22:46, Patrick Burroughs wrote: > > > >> The new replacement for ifconfig is 'ip'; 'ip link show' is equivalent > >> to the old 'ifconfig', without arguments. > > > > I don't see the curren

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.3-1, net-tools-1.60-16, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2, ypbind-mt-1.33-2, iproute2-2.6.38-3

2011-06-08 Thread Cédric Girard
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > You should use just use "ip addr" rather than "ifconfig" (which saves > you one character ;-) ). > No both can be 5 keystrokes: Yes this message was completely unuseful! :p -- Cédric Girard

Re: [arch-general] pacman tries to install nvidia drivers?

2011-06-08 Thread John K Pate
> Probably this bug https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24608 Oh yes, it's exactly that. I removed luxrender (which I've ended up not using) and the update goes through fine. Thanks, John K Pate http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/s0930006/ -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, register

Re: [arch-general] pacman tries to install nvidia drivers?

2011-06-08 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 06/08/2011 05:43 PM, John K Pate wrote: Hello all, I don't have an nvidia graphics card: $ lspci | grep VGA 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 09) Yet when I try to update (with -Syyu just to be sure), I get: $ s

Re: [arch-general] pacman tries to install nvidia drivers?

2011-06-08 Thread Ionut Biru
On 06/08/2011 06:43 PM, John K Pate wrote: Hello all, Why does pacman try to install nvidia-utils for me? I have intel-dri installed and my graphics work fine. I assume the dependency cycle is unrelated... Thanks, maybe https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24608 ? -- Ionuț

[arch-general] pacman tries to install nvidia drivers?

2011-06-08 Thread John K Pate
Hello all, I don't have an nvidia graphics card: $ lspci | grep VGA 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 09) Yet when I try to update (with -Syyu just to be sure), I get: $ sudo pacman -Syyu :: Synchronising package dat

Re: [arch-general] Reboot - Versioned Kernel Installs

2011-06-08 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote: > On Wednesday 08 June 2011 15:45:21 Tom Gundersen wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: >> > If you want this, implement it! I have seen some discussions about it and >> > it always tend to users wanting feature

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.3-1, net-tools-1.60-16, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2, ypbind-mt-1.33-2, iproute2-2.6.38-3

2011-06-08 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:17 PM, mangust wrote: > On 06/08/2011 01:41 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: >> Yes, documentation should be updated. Help with this is very much >> appreciated! I will personally start working on this once the release >> is out (time permitting). > > Hey Tom, what help do you nee

Re: [arch-general] Reboot - Versioned Kernel Installs

2011-06-08 Thread Paul Gideon Dann
On Wednesday 08 June 2011 15:45:21 Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > > If you want this, implement it! I have seen some discussions about it and > > it always tend to users wanting feature X or Y, but didn't commit to it. > > protip: iirc there are s

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.3-1, net-tools-1.60-16, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2, ypbind-mt-1.33-2, iproute2-2.6.38-3

2011-06-08 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Mauro Santos wrote: > On 07-06-2011 22:46, Patrick Burroughs wrote: > >> The new replacement for ifconfig is 'ip'; 'ip link show' is equivalent >> to the old 'ifconfig', without arguments. > > I don't see the current assigned IP when doing 'ip link show' so I don't

Re: [arch-general] Reboot - Versioned Kernel Installs

2011-06-08 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On 06/08/2011 04:12 PM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote: >> >> I would really like to the kernel that is being replaced kept as a backup. >>  If >> the latest kernel breaks your hardware, or something else goes wrong, I'd >> like >> to have the opt

Re: [arch-general] Reboot - Versioned Kernel Installs

2011-06-08 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 06/08/2011 04:12 PM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote: I would really like to the kernel that is being replaced kept as a backup. If the latest kernel breaks your hardware, or something else goes wrong, I'd like to have the option of using the kernel that was just replaced, because it's known to work.

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.3-1, net-tools-1.60-16, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2, ypbind-mt-1.33-2, iproute2-2.6.38-3

2011-06-08 Thread mangust
On 06/08/2011 01:41 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > Yes, documentation should be updated. Help with this is very much > appreciated! I will personally start working on this once the release > is out (time permitting). Hey Tom, what help do you need with the documentation?

Re: [arch-general] Reboot - Versioned Kernel Installs

2011-06-08 Thread Paul Gideon Dann
I would really like to the kernel that is being replaced kept as a backup. If the latest kernel breaks your hardware, or something else goes wrong, I'd like to have the option of using the kernel that was just replaced, because it's known to work. I wouldn't want more than one old version of t

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.3-1, net-tools-1.60-16, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2, ypbind-mt-1.33-2, iproute2-2.6.38-3

2011-06-08 Thread Byron Clark
On 06/08/11 at 02:30pm, Mauro Santos wrote: > On 07-06-2011 22:46, Patrick Burroughs wrote: > > > The new replacement for ifconfig is 'ip'; 'ip link show' is equivalent > > to the old 'ifconfig', without arguments. > > I don't see the current assigned IP when doing 'ip link show' so I don't > see

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.3-1, net-tools-1.60-16, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2, ypbind-mt-1.33-2, iproute2-2.6.38-3

2011-06-08 Thread Mauro Santos
On 07-06-2011 22:46, Patrick Burroughs wrote: > The new replacement for ifconfig is 'ip'; 'ip link show' is equivalent > to the old 'ifconfig', without arguments. I don't see the current assigned IP when doing 'ip link show' so I don't see how that is equivalent to using only ifconfig without arg

[arch-general] [signoff] jfsutils-1.1.15-1

2011-06-08 Thread Tobias Powalowski
New in 1.1.15 - 2011-03-04 * Several fixes for large filesystems where 64-bit variables are needed * Fix incorrect size check on directories * Make the timestamp format consisten Please signoff both arches, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-lts 2.6.32.41-2

2011-06-08 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Dienstag 07 Juni 2011 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: > Latest LTS kernel is in testing, > please signoff for both arches > > - synced with .39 config and enabled the ftracers > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24404 > > greetings > tpowa anynone? -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Packa

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.3-1, net-tools-1.60-16, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2, ypbind-mt-1.33-2, iproute2-2.6.38-3

2011-06-08 Thread Vic Demuzere
2011/6/8 Cédric Girard : > > Maybe this should be added to the announcement (the fact that net-tools will > still be there). > > -- > Cédric Girard > Yeah, this should be in the announcement. I thought net-tools would be removed completely. -- Vic Demuzere

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] coreutils-8.12-2, initscripts-2011.06.3-1, net-tools-1.60-16, udev-171-2, yp-tools-2.12-2, ypbind-mt-1.33-2, iproute2-2.6.38-3

2011-06-08 Thread Cédric Girard
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > I didn't mention this explicitly, as this upgrade is not supposed to > remove net-tools, so in principle ifconfig should still work. > Maybe this should be added to the announcement (the fact that net-tools will still be there). -- Cédric