On 25.06.2014 22:02:51, Florian Pritz wrote:
As requested by Lukas, I've created a new mailing list for AUR related
requests such as deletion, merge or orphan requests.
The AUR will soon feature a web interface to create such requests and
for history and discussion purposes mails will be sent to
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 22:59 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 22:57 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 16:48 -0400, Daniel Micay wrote:
> > > On 25/06/14 04:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > > Why is the Evolution package in extra evolution 3.12.3-1,
> > > > https:
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 22:57 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 16:48 -0400, Daniel Micay wrote:
> > On 25/06/14 04:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > Why is the Evolution package in extra evolution 3.12.3-1,
> > > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/evolution/ , when the
>
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 16:48 -0400, Daniel Micay wrote:
> On 25/06/14 04:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > Why is the Evolution package in extra evolution 3.12.3-1,
> > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/evolution/ , when the
> > current stable version from upstream still is 3.12.2?
> >
>
On 25/06/14 04:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Why is the Evolution package in extra evolution 3.12.3-1,
> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/evolution/ , when the
> current stable version from upstream still is 3.12.2?
>
> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 20:07 +0100, at evolution-l...@gnome.org P
Why is the Evolution package in extra evolution 3.12.3-1,
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/evolution/ , when the
current stable version from upstream still is 3.12.2?
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 20:07 +0100, at evolution-l...@gnome.org Patrick
O'Callaghan wrote:
> the latest stable releas
Hi,
As requested by Lukas, I've created a new mailing list for AUR related
requests such as deletion, merge or orphan requests.
The AUR will soon feature a web interface to create such requests and
for history and discussion purposes mails will be sent to this new list.
Please start using it for
Am Mittwoch, den 25.06.2014, 12:40 +0200 schrieb Davor Rotim:
> Yes, same issue here. All services start normally just no logging to the
> journal. For example, journalctl -u systemd-networkd will only show logs
> until the systemd 214 upgrade after that as if it never existed (but
> strangely ever
I have reported this to the bug tracker: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/40970
Yes, same issue here. All services start normally just no logging to the
journal. For example, journalctl -u systemd-networkd will only show logs
until the systemd 214 upgrade after that as if it never existed (but
strangely everything works normally). This is on 3.15.1-1-ARCH i686.
This is not correct. :-)
Fail2ban needs to somehow get those messages from journald. Did you
try disabling it for a boot?
When you update today, maybe trying to log the clogging of your
services (eg. strace) would be a good idea.
cheers!
mar77i
Am Mittwoch, den 25.06.2014, 11:01 +0200 schrieb Martti Kühne:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Stefan Tatschner
> > The lack of journal messages also mean that fail2ban does not work;
> > that's really bad. I will try updating once again later this day and
> > I'll let you know.
>
> I'm not sur
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Stefan Tatschner
wrote:
> I dont't get *ANY* message after booting the machine. After every
> service has been started (my last one is always fail2ban) I do not get
> any more messages. This includes e.g. postfix, amavis, ssh, dovecot,
> cron, sudo things, ...
>
>
Hi
I'm trying to improve the unit for a fan manager daemon for MacBook Pro.
As it is, it's a dependency of multi-user.target. I would like it to
start earlier in the boot process, so that he is available with
rescue.target, and to refresh the computer during bootup.
I tried with DefaultDepen
Hi
With the 214 systemd update, I now get during boot a lot of messages
from NetworkManager. They are at loglevel . I didn't changed
journald.conf. I also noticed that an other daemon outputs logs.
Did the default log level changed ? How can I change that ?
Thanks
Am Mittwoch, den 25.06.2014, 08:58 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
> [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ uname -rm
> 3.8.13-rt14-1-rt x86_64
> [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ pacman -Si linux-lts | grep Version
> Version: 3.10.44-1
>
> I still don't know what messages you don't get, however, I get messages
16 matches
Mail list logo
