Re: [arch-general] usable browser?

2009-11-26 Thread Thomas Bewick
Tobias Kieslich wrote: dillo, simplistic, bone simple, limitations on the functionality Bottomline, if you need the features live with the overload. In Linux there are three full featured rendering engines: - gecko - webkit - opera you ruled out all of them, so what's left has serious short

Re: [arch-general] usable browser?

2009-11-26 Thread Thomas Bewick
Robert Howard wrote: I don't understand why people want to use software that has no features. If something has more than one feature, people bitch about bloat. FF is not that bad nor is Seamonkey or any of the webkit stuff. On Nov 26, 2009 9:52 PM, Thomas Bewick tombew...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [arch-general] X fails to start with intel card after latest kernel update

2009-10-15 Thread Thomas Bewick
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 16:16 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: On Sunday 11 October 2009 03:33:57 am Jan Spakula wrote: Excerpts from David C. Rankin's message of So Okt 11 10:16:57 +0200 2009: On Sunday 11 October 2009 03:10:15 am David C. Rankin wrote: I'm back already. The wiki page must be