Am Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:33:48 -0600
schrieb Aaron Griffin :
> Mr Heiko, I know you feel you have a vested interest in this topic,
> but you're just adding useless noise to the discussion. This is quite
> ironic as this is EXACTLY what you claim will not happen were we to
> allow comments on closed
There is already an arch-general thread about this topic. This one was
intended to gauge the opinions of the _developers_ (hence the reason
it was on the dev list).
I am all for keeping things open, but polluting things with arguments
from outside is just making this harder. And now this discussio
Am Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:32:20 -0600
schrieb "David C. Rankin" :
> This is currently the state at opensuse and KDE and is a primary
> reason for all the new Arch users and all the new users of xfce,
> fluxbox and gnome.
There also may be some other reasons for all the new Arch users. ;-)
> Arch ha
Xavier Chantry wrote:
The tiny size of the reopen textbox does not give a lot of freedom for
justifications either.
I think this is completely missing the point though. I don't
understand why Dan is the only developer who sees that it sometimes
makes sense to provide additional information on clo
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 04:32:20PM -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
> This is currently the state at opensuse and KDE and is a primary reason for
> all
> the new Arch users and all the new users of xfce, fluxbox and gnome.
>
> We are all in this together. One of the things that makes a distro great
On 03/12/2010 06:20 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:39:05 +1000
> schrieb Allan McRae :
>
>> I really do not see the need.
>>
>> If a bug is wrongly closed -> request a reopen.
>> If you just want to confirm a bug has been fixed, there is no need...
>> we already closed the bug re
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>
> I do not see all reopen requests, but the need to "beg" seems overstated...
> I do know that it is much, much easier to get a bug reopened if the request
> is clear and well justified. A large portion of reopen requests provide no
> informa
On 13/03/10 22:55, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:58:24 +0100
schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
Yes, there are sometimes situations where I wanted to add a more or
less important comment to a bug reports but it was just closed.
In the other hand I see the problems of never ending discussions
Am Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:58:24 +0100
schrieb Pierre Schmitz :
> Yes, there are sometimes situations where I wanted to add a more or
> less important comment to a bug reports but it was just closed.
>
> In the other hand I see the problems of never ending discussions and
> flame wars.
In other bug
Am Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:22:35 -0500
schrieb Robert Howard :
> What do other distros do on their bugtrackers? We should allow
> comments after closing to facilitate further user input. Lets not
> forget that Arch Linux would not be in it's current state without
> user/dev interaction.
I used Gentoo
What do other distros do on their bugtrackers? We should allow comments
after closing to facilitate further user input. Lets not forget that Arch
Linux would not be in it's current state without user/dev interaction.
On Mar 12, 2010 7:19 PM, "Heiko Baums" wrote:
Am Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:39:05 +100
Am Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:39:05 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae :
> I really do not see the need.
>
> If a bug is wrongly closed -> request a reopen.
> If you just want to confirm a bug has been fixed, there is no need...
> we already closed the bug report.
> If there is a "better" fix, reopen request or
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> So closing a bug becomes 1) remove yourself from
> assignees, 2) remove from notification, 3) close bug.
This is what worries me the most. If comments on old bugs are allowed,
this will become the norm.
On 13/03/10 09:13, Xavier Chantry wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 13/03/10 08:35, Aaron Griffin wrote:
Does anyone have an opinion on this?
In my eyes, I imagine the kind of people who want this feature simply
wish to argue about the closing. I've had to deal w
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 13/03/10 08:35, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone have an opinion on this?
>>
>> In my eyes, I imagine the kind of people who want this feature simply
>> wish to argue about the closing. I've had to deal with enough PM
>> requests in t
15 matches
Mail list logo