Thanks for all the quick replies!
I was actually missing base-devel ^_^
2010/2/24 gt
> Wow did all of you post simultaneously ;)
>
Wow did all of you post simultaneously ;)
On 24.02.2010 00:11, Michishige Kaito wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Maybe I'm just not understanding how Arch works, so please forgive my
> ignorance. I come from ubuntu, and there you get development headers for
> most packages by following the naming convention, which is package-dev. A
> quick apt-cache sear
On Tue 23 Feb 2010 23:11 +, Michishige Kaito wrote:
> Maybe I'm just not understanding how Arch works, so please forgive my
> ignorance. I come from ubuntu, and there you get development headers for
> most packages by following the naming convention, which is package-dev. A
> quick apt-cache se
On Feb 23, 2010, at 18:11, Michishige Kaito
wrote:
Hey,
Maybe I'm just not understanding how Arch works, so please forgive my
ignorance. I come from ubuntu, and there you get development headers
for
most packages by following the naming convention, which is package-
dev. A
quick apt-cac
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:11:12PM +, Michishige Kaito wrote:
> Maybe I'm just not understanding how Arch works, so please forgive my
> ignorance. I come from ubuntu, and there you get development headers for
> most packages by following the naming convention, which is package-dev. A
> quick a
On 02/24/2010 01:11 AM, Michishige Kaito wrote:
Hey,
Maybe I'm just not understanding how Arch works, so please forgive my
ignorance. I come from ubuntu, and there you get development headers for
most packages by following the naming convention, which is package-dev. A
quick apt-cache search pac
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Michishige Kaito
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Maybe I'm just not understanding how Arch works, so please forgive my
> ignorance. I come from ubuntu, and there you get development headers for
> most packages by following the naming convention, which is package-dev. A
> quick a
8 matches
Mail list logo