Armando M. Baratti a écrit :
> Xavier wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Thomas Bächler
>> wrote:
>>> Xavier schrieb:
Unfortunately we can no longer check the cvs repo afaik.
We cannot see earlier than April 2008 :
http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/udev/trunk/PKGBUILD?vie
Xavier wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Xavier schrieb:
Unfortunately we can no longer check the cvs repo afaik.
We cannot see earlier than April 2008 :
http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/udev/trunk/PKGBUILD?view=log
I am also curious to know how did that file s
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Xavier schrieb:
>>
>> Unfortunately we can no longer check the cvs repo afaik.
>> We cannot see earlier than April 2008 :
>> http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/udev/trunk/PKGBUILD?view=log
>>
>> I am also curious to know how did that file
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>
> Yes, I found it confusing to have so many repositories with different names,
> there was nothing to uniquely point out that all the CVS stuff was
> historical. We don't even have CVS installed anymore.
>
>
I did use the cvs stuff several t
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Xavier schrieb:
Unfortunately we can no longer check the cvs repo afaik.
We cannot see earlier than April 2008 :
http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/udev/trunk/PKGBUILD?view=log
I am also curious to know how did th
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Xavier schrieb:
>>
>> Unfortunately we can no longer check the cvs repo afaik.
>> We cannot see earlier than April 2008 :
>> http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/udev/trunk/PKGBUILD?view=log
>>
>> I am also curious to know how did that file
Xavier schrieb:
Unfortunately we can no longer check the cvs repo afaik.
We cannot see earlier than April 2008 :
http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/udev/trunk/PKGBUILD?view=log
I am also curious to know how did that file stay. Why wasn't it
tracked and removed by pacman ?
The old cvs-arch a
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
>
>> ... and back! That was it indeed. Ah, well, how long did I live with
>> that antediluvian udev.rules file? It was dated March 2008 and did not
>> even belong to the udev package... Wonder what ill it caused otherwise.
>> Well. Gone no
My system is uptodate with the current testing repo. During bootup today
I noticed the error message:
/etc/rc.sysinit: line 364: /dev/tty[0-9]*: no such file or directory
To my surprise, only /dev/tty was present, but none of tty0..9. Instead
there was a device literall
Firmicus a écrit :
> Thomas Bächler a écrit :
>
>> Firmicus schrieb:
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> My system is uptodate with the current testing repo. During bootup today
>>> I noticed the error message:
>>> /etc/rc.sysinit: line 364: /dev/tty[0-9]*: no such file or directory
>>> To my surp
Thomas Bächler a écrit :
> Firmicus schrieb:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> My system is uptodate with the current testing repo. During bootup today
>> I noticed the error message:
>> /etc/rc.sysinit: line 364: /dev/tty[0-9]*: no such file or directory
>> To my surprise, only /dev/tty was present, but none
Firmicus schrieb:
Hi folks,
My system is uptodate with the current testing repo. During bootup today
I noticed the error message:
/etc/rc.sysinit: line 364: /dev/tty[0-9]*: no such file or directory
To my surprise, only /dev/tty was present, but none of tty0..9. Instead
there was a device li
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Firmicus wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> My system is uptodate with the current testing repo. During bootup today
> I noticed the error message:
> /etc/rc.sysinit: line 364: /dev/tty[0-9]*: no such file or directory
> To my surprise, only /dev/tty was present, but none
13 matches
Mail list logo
