Hi All,
I am working on $subject for IS 5.5.0.
When handling custom claims, we do have two options.
1. Handling custom claims as we have handled it in the
SAML2BearerGrantHandler.
- Current SAML2BearerGrantHandler converts the claims coming from IDP
to local claims and then fil
Hi Megala,
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Megala Uthayakumar
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am working on $subject for IS 5.5.0.
>
> When handling custom claims, we do have two options.
>
>1. Handling custom claims as we have handled it in the
>SAML2BearerGrantHandler.
> - Current SAML2
Hi Bhathiya,
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 1:05 PM, Bhathiya Jayasekara
wrote:
> Hi Megala,
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Megala Uthayakumar
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am working on $subject for IS 5.5.0.
>>
>> When handling custom claims, we do have two options.
>>
>>1. Handling custo
Thanks, I just understood the scenario.
Thanks,
Bhathiya
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Megala Uthayakumar wrote:
> Hi Bhathiya,
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 1:05 PM, Bhathiya Jayasekara
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Megala,
>>
>> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Megala Uthayakumar
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi A
Hi,
As per the meeting held offline, it was decide to only send the custom
claims when the scope is given as "openid". Sending custom claims that are
not defined in dialect can be supported by adding new claims to openid
dialect and by appending the relevant scopes to "/oidc" resource in config
re
*Hi,*
*As per the offline discussion with IAM team, following is the agreed
design.*
*Darshana/Maduranga/Farasath/IAM Team - Please do correct me if I have
misunderstood regarding this.*
*Thanks.*
Regards,
Megala
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Megala Uthayakumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As per t
Resending the missing image
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Megala Uthayakumar wrote:
> *Hi,*
>
> *As per the offline discussion with IAM team, following is the agreed
> design.*
>
>
>
> *Darshana/Maduranga/Farasath/IAM Team - Please do correct me if I have
> misunderstood regarding this.*
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 4:04 PM, Megala Uthayakumar wrote:
> Resending the missing image
>
>
>
Regarding "SP Claim Mapping exist with requested attributes" decision,
shouldn't this simply be SP requested claims since we do not care about SP
claim mapping in OIDC flow?
>
>
> On Wed, May 30,
Yes. I tried to explain the same thing, seems it is confusing. I will
simplify it.
Thanks.
Regards,
Megala
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 4:12 PM, Farasath Ahamed wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 4:04 PM, Megala Uthayakumar
> wrote:
>
>> Resending the missing image
>>
>>
>>
>
> Regarding "SP Cla
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Megala Uthayakumar wrote:
> Yes. I tried to explain the same thing, seems it is confusing. I will
> simplify it.
>
Thanks for the clarification.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Megala
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 4:12 PM, Farasath Ahamed
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed,
10 matches
Mail list logo