Kevin Carson wrote:
>
> >From: Bryan Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >First, the roads and airports are already here, so there would not be
> >much of a decentralizing effect of cutting off subsidies and eminent
> >domain now.
>
> But because of the effect of subsidies in distorting the market
>> . . . suggests you mean "eminent" (rather than
>> "imminent") domain . . .
What he wrote first was "immanent", which makes
more obvious sense than either of the above. ;)
--
Anton Sherwood, http://www.ogre.nu/
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please bear with me
>as the proofreader inside suggests you mean "eminent" (rather than
>"imminent") domain in referring to the alleged *right* of governments to
>take
>control of private property for public use.
Yep, you caught me. D'oh!!
___
>From: Bryan Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>First, the roads and airports are already here, so there would not be
>much of a decentralizing effect of cutting off subsidies and eminent
>domain now.
But because of the effect of subsidies in distorting the market price link
between quantity supplied
<< I think you're underestimating the massive effects of state capitalist
intervention not only individuallly, but the synergy between them.
Regarding transportation subsidies alone, Tibor Machan wrote a good article
for The Freeman (August 99, I think) against not on
Kevin Carson wrote:
>
> I think you're underestimating the massive effects of state capitalist
> intervention not only individuallly, but the synergy between them.
Don't forget the synergies on the other side.
> Regarding transportation subsidies alone, Tibor Machan wrote a good article
> for T
I think you're underestimating the massive effects of state capitalist
intervention not only individuallly, but the synergy between them.
Regarding transportation subsidies alone, Tibor Machan wrote a good article
for The Freeman (August 99, I think) against not only transportation
subsidies,
john hull wrote:
> What does "IMO" mean?
In My Opinion. You'll also see IMH(umble)O, whence IMNSHO ...
IMO is also a brand of sour cream or some such.
--
Anton Sherwood, http://www.ogre.nu/
Sorry. It means "in my opinion."
>From: john hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Silent Takeover--IMO??
>Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 20:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
>
>--- Kevin Carson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
--- Kevin Carson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"The chief failing of the mainstream
"antiglobalization" movement is, IMO, they fail to
recognize the extent that the global corporate economy
rests on state intervention."
What does "IMO" mean?
-jsh
__
Bryan Caplan wrote:
> A lot of regulations only kick in if you have more than 50 or 100
> employees.
Some explicitly kick out, though. I dimly remember one concerning
visas, that said roughly "If the HR department says the firm needs this
alien employee, and the firm has >N employees, we (the IN
Kevin Carson wrote:
> I would argue that the rise of transnational corporations is a "bad thing"
> because they are products of state capitalism. Giant corporations, from the
> late 19th century on, have been statist institutions, and the plutocrats
> associated with them have been rent-seekers.
gt;From: "Burns, Erik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Silent Takeover
>Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:39:23 +0100
>
>i read this awhile back; it's kind of thin. the most interesting thing is
>that Ms. Hertz us
ED]]On Behalf Of
> chris macrae
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:03 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Silent Takeover>
>
> I ordered it from Amazon...was then told it was a poor publishers me-too
> rival to Naomi Klein...would be amused to hear other views...meanwh
I ordered it from Amazon...was then told it was a poor publishers me-too
rival to Naomi Klein...would be amused to hear other views...meanwhile I
would have thought Stiglitz Globalization and its Discontents should be
nearer this list's essence (again a provocation to tell me how wrong I am)
chri
15 matches
Mail list logo
