Re: ARS+Oracle InstantClient information

2007-02-08 Thread Tony Worthington
Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] 262-703-5911 Tony Worthington/Corp/Kohls 02/07/2007 01:07 PM To arslist@ARSLIST.ORG cc Subject Re: ARS+Oracle InstantClient information Well... the quick version is... We use 10.2.0.3.0 instantclient to connect to 9.2.0.7.0 instance no problemo. Our Remedy

Re: ARS+Oracle InstantClient information

2007-02-07 Thread patrick zandi
) arslist@ARSLIST.ORG 02/01/2007 11:59 AM Please respond to arslist@ARSLIST.ORG To arslist@ARSLIST.ORG cc Subject Re: ARS+Oracle InstantClient information ** Is this supported ? the documentation says to use the Two_task, and say remote DB.. your example does not ? I am just

Re: ARS+Oracle InstantClient information

2007-02-07 Thread patrick zandi
) arslist@ARSLIST.ORG 02/01/2007 11:59 AM Please respond to arslist@ARSLIST.ORG To arslist@ARSLIST.ORG cc Subject Re: ARS+Oracle InstantClient information ** Is this supported ? the documentation says to use the Two_task, and say remote DB.. your example does not ? I am just asking.. On 2

ARS+Oracle InstantClient information

2007-02-01 Thread Tony Worthington
I can't remember if I posted anything on this topic before, but I figured I'd share what I've figured out with my testing of ARS+InstantClient. For those not familiar InstantClient is a stripped down (libs only) version of the client. Our install 10.2.0.3 with sqlplus component is only 25MB

Re: ARS+Oracle InstantClient information

2007-02-01 Thread Bruce Scott
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Worthington Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 10:35 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: ARS+Oracle InstantClient information I can't remember if I posted anything on this topic before, but I figured I'd share what I've figured out with my testing of ARS+InstantClient

Re: ARS+Oracle InstantClient information

2007-02-01 Thread Axton
, as my last position was using SQL 2000/2003. Thanks, Bruce -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Worthington Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 10:35 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: ARS+Oracle InstantClient

Re: ARS+Oracle InstantClient information

2007-02-01 Thread Tony Worthington
/2007 11:37 AM Please respond to arslist@ARSLIST.ORG To arslist@ARSLIST.ORG cc Subject Re: ARS+Oracle InstantClient information Tony, What is the advantage of using InstantClient over the standard client installation? I'm new to the Oracle DB side of Remedy, as my last position was using

Re: ARS+Oracle InstantClient information

2007-02-01 Thread patrick zandi
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Worthington Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 10:35 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: ARS+Oracle InstantClient information I can't remember if I posted anything on this topic before, but I figured I'd share what I've figured out with my testing of ARS

Re: ARS+Oracle InstantClient information

2007-02-01 Thread Tony Worthington
discussion list(ARSList) arslist@ARSLIST.ORG 02/01/2007 11:59 AM Please respond to arslist@ARSLIST.ORG To arslist@ARSLIST.ORG cc Subject Re: ARS+Oracle InstantClient information ** Is this supported ? the documentation says to use the Two_task, and say remote DB.. your example does

Re: ARS+Oracle InstantClient information

2007-02-01 Thread Axton
To arslist@ARSLIST.ORG cc Subject Re: ARS+Oracle InstantClient information ** Is this supported ? the documentation says to use the Two_task, and say remote DB.. your example does not ? I am just asking.. On 2/1/07, Tony Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Size. 600+MB vs 25. Plus there's