[ARTIQ] [RFC] remove RTIOCollision

2017-03-15 Thread Sébastien Bourdeauducq via ARTIQ
Hi, RTIOCollision is a bit tedious to implement with DRTIO, since the master does not know if a given channel should do replace or collision. The satellite would need to report this information for each of its channels (and this also needs to be passed from the gateware scripts to the satelli

Re: [ARTIQ] [RFC] remove RTIOCollision

2017-03-15 Thread Robert Jördens via ARTIQ
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Sébastien Bourdeauducq via ARTIQ wrote: > Hi, > > RTIOCollision is a bit tedious to implement with DRTIO, since the master > does not know if a given channel should do replace or collision. The > satellite would need to report this information for each of its chann

Re: [ARTIQ] [RFC] remove RTIOCollision

2017-03-20 Thread Slichter, Daniel H. (Fed) via ARTIQ
> Why not do blind submission and do the replacement at the satellite side > plus asynchronous error reporting like RTIOBusy? As long as the satellite is able to handle things appropriately for the type of channel it is, I am OK with this. If it's a TTL you should do replace (as is currently us