Re: [aspectj-users] Runtime performance against different weaving options

2014-06-04 Thread 马leon
Cool, Thanks a lot! Leon > From: alexan...@kriegisch.name > To: aspectj-users@eclipse.org > Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 11:18:48 +0200 > Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] Runtime performance against different weaving > options > > Hi Leon. > > In general, CTW and PCTW should

Re: [aspectj-users] Runtime performance against different weaving options

2014-06-04 Thread Alexander Kriegisch
Hi Leon. In general, CTW and PCTW should be the same in performance because you just have normal classloading plus aspectjrt.jar. Only for LTW you have a "warm-up" phase because aspect weaving needs to be done during classloading. This is why you need the weaving agent (aspectjweaver.jar which

[aspectj-users] Runtime performance against different weaving options

2014-06-04 Thread 马leon
Hi, I know there're 3 ways to weaving: compile-time, post compile time and load-time I'd like to know is there any performance comparison for above 3 ways. By "performance", I mean all classes have been loaded and the server gets warm-up for some time. Thanks Leon