, February 12, 2006 9:52
AM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Historical
Background of Nagaland
Chandan
I might as well divulge the truth. I happened to read in a very
confidential document about what the Government thought about Phizo at the
time. It is on that basis I made my remark. It
Title: Re: [Assam] Historical Background of
Nagaland
At 10:57 AM -0500 2/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chandan
I am not replying to the rest of the points you've
raised. I think it is not worth responding to.
*** I understand BK. I didn't think you would either. Sometimes
sile
Chandan
I am not replying to the rest of the points you've raised. I think it is
not worth responding to.
Bhuban
___
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
Chandan
I might as well divulge the truth. I happened to read in a very
confidential document about what the Government thought about Phizo at the time.
It is on that basis I made my remark. It was so many years ago. In fact he was
taken aback. He took me in confidence as well.
It was a ver
Title: Re: [Assam] Historical Background of
Nagaland
>When I told Phizo that Government of India no longer
took him seriously, he tried to prove to me that he was not a spent
force as it appeared.
*** You really did tell him off, didn't you?
Served him right!
>I am sorry to
In a message dated 11/02/2006 20:41:31 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From day one they had been telling that
they donot want to stay with India. Accord has been signed that after ten
years of independence, they can choose what they want. And they choose
'independence
aking could you write a brief
essay on the whole thing highlighting the main events.?
Rajen
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Assam@assamnet.org
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 11:36
AM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Historical
Ram
Thanks for the endorsement. You're right too.
Regards
Bhuban
___
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
Bhuban da,
That was a very good synopsis of insurgency in India.
>Today, I think the parleys with the Issac-Muivah et al are nothing but an eye-wash. I am sorry to say >that in case of ULFA also it is so because the Government has become experienced in the art of >dealing with insurgents. Kashm
Dear Baruah Saheb
You’ve asked my views about the Naga problem. I do
have them coupled with the fact that my political forecasts had always been
proved wrong in the long run. I console myself with the fact that political
solutions are seldom predictable. An example of this is the grant of
Message -
From:
umesh
sharma
To: Rajen Barua ; assam@assamnet.org
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:25
AM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Historical
Background of Nagaland - apology for conquests?
Rajen-da.
I do not know that you subscribe to myths. Anyone who has read Indian
hru-Patel
Bangladesh - by Indira Gandhi. This is just a clarification of the myth that India never attacked another country. RB- Original Message - From: umesh sharma To: Barua25 ; assam@assamnet.org Sent:
Thursday, February 09, 2006 10:24 AM Subject: Re: [Assam] Histo
2006 2:39
PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Historical
Background of Nagaland
Dear Barua Saheb
I wonder who is the author of this account. This does not appear to be
the whole truth. As far as I know there were a few properly British
administered districts except the Tuensang area
Dear Barua Saheb
I wonder who is the author of this account. This does not appear to be the
whole truth. As far as I know there were a few properly British administered
districts except the Tuensang area, which was described as partially
administered.
I also find it odd that there was no
Dear Barua,
This is an interesting piece. Where did you get this article from?
--Ram
On 2/8/06, Barua25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is a myth being circulated that India is a country which never invaded other country. This is however is not true. In case of Nagaland, India definitely in
l
Bangladesh - by Indira
Gandhi.
This is just a clarification of the
myth that India never attacked another country.
RB
- Original Message -
From:
umesh
sharma
To: Barua25 ; assam@assamnet.org
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 10:24
AM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Hi
for that matter Sardar Patel is credited with the liberation of Rajasthan - many of whose kingdoms did not want to join India or the case of Junagarh, Hyderabad and Goa - which had to be annexed. California was annexed by USA from Spain- if my history is correct. Why not give the whol
There is a myth being
circulated that India is a country which never invaded other country. This
is however is not true. In case of Nagaland, India definitely invaded the
country. The Naga's, who time and time again have made it
known to both former colonizer Britain and newly emerging Ind
18 matches
Mail list logo
