Rich Adamson wrote:
fc3, current cvs-head from 1:25pm today...
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk/stdtime'
gcc -pipe -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declaration
s -g -Iinclude -I../include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -O6 -march=i686 -DZAPTE
L_OPTIMIZATIONS
Rich Adamson wrote:
logger.c: In function `ast_queue_log':
logger.c:369: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
That's quite bizarre, to say the least. I'm not able to reproduce it
here... and nothing of consequence has changed in that file. I did make
some changes that affect the ast_m
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 13:27 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote:
> fc3, current cvs-head from 1:25pm today...
>
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk/stdtime'
> gcc -pipe -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
> -Wmissing-declaration
> s -g -Iinclude -I../include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SO
fc3, current cvs-head from 1:25pm today...
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk/stdtime'
gcc -pipe -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declaration
s -g -Iinclude -I../include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -O6 -march=i686 -DZAPTE
L_OPTIMIZATIONS -fomit-frame-
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
i personally agree that the warning is bogus, and this is also
the opinion i read on some of the FreeBSD lists. But, not being
able to provide or even suggest a fix, i don't see much of an
alternative than trying to code around it when it is not too disgusting.
Right. So in
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 12:44:42PM -0600, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > The following fails with gcc 3.4.4 as well, for t defined as [u]int{8|16}_t,
> > on FreeBSD at least.
>
> The initial answer from the GCC community is just as you proposed;
> because the platform's ABI c
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
The following fails with gcc 3.4.4 as well, for t defined as [u]int{8|16}_t,
on FreeBSD at least.
The initial answer from the GCC community is just as you proposed;
because the platform's ABI can only pass 32-bit quantities by value,
then the function's prototype is implic
José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández wrote:
On Mon 31 Oct 2005 15:10, Steven Critchfield wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 14:53 -0300, José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández wrote:
Is there an Asterisk application or a program that I could run with
System that would generate a .call file with the paramete
On Mon 31 Oct 2005 15:21, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 02:53:06PM -0300, José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández
wrote:
> > Is there an Asterisk application or a program that I could run with
> > System that would generate a .call file with the parameters I pass ?
> > Thank you.
>
> a. -us
On Mon 31 Oct 2005 15:10, Steven Critchfield wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 14:53 -0300, José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández wrote:
> > Is there an Asterisk application or a program that I could run with
> > System that would generate a .call file with the parameters I pass ?
> > Thank you.
>
> Yeah, it
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 02:53:06PM -0300, José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández wrote:
> Is there an Asterisk application or a program that I could run with System
> that would generate a .call file with the parameters I pass ?
> Thank you.
a. -users question
b. IIRC there is an app called Originate.
c.
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 14:53 -0300, José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández wrote:
> Is there an Asterisk application or a program that I could run with System
> that would generate a .call file with the parameters I pass ?
> Thank you.
Yeah, it is a program you write. It is a really simple file to create.
Is there an Asterisk application or a program that I could run with System
that would generate a .call file with the parameters I pass ?
Thank you.
--
José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández
___
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com
http://lists
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
The following fails with gcc 3.4.4 as well, for t defined as [u]int{8|16}_t,
on FreeBSD at least.
It fails on Linux using GCC 3.3.5, 3.4.3 and 4.0.1, on both x86 and
x86-64. I think this is a bug in the compiler, actually, based on the
description of -Wconversion and the w
Jared Smith wrote:
My gut reaction would be to do this with a Dial() macro (the M option to
Dial).
I believe those macros run in the context of the called channel, not the
calling channel.
___
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 08:39 -0800, Ed Greenberg wrote:
> I've been asked to configure Asterisk to send a tone back to the caller
> when the call is answered - to indicate answer supervision.
>
> Has anybody done this before? Is there interest in it? Am I missing
> something?
My gut reaction wo
How about Playtones? That's exactly what you're talking about
->-Original Message-
->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
->Ed Greenberg
->Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 11:40 AM
->To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List
->Subject: [Asterisk-Dev] Send tone to ca
17 matches
Mail list logo
