On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 06:59:44PM -0600, Moises Silva wrote:
MS Hum, it seems to work with slinear, ulaw, alaw and gsm, but not with
MS iLBC, it complains about ilbc frame not being multiple of 50, so i
MS tried to make it happy, but still misses some translations from
MS slinear to iLBC and
Tilghman wrote:
On Monday 06 November 2006 12:36, Dan Austin wrote:
'Fixing' app_conference is a worthy endevour, but convincing
chan_iax to honor framing limits on both the send and receive
legs of a channel would be a big win. Even better would be
the addition of an IE to convey the
On 11/6/06, Dan Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the scenario that Moises described, it sounds
like he might managed the server that the SPA is registered to. If
he had the ability to force the framing between the two servers to
20ms, it would have helped. It would not help if an endpoint
Hum, it seems to work with slinear, ulaw, alaw and gsm, but not with
iLBC, it complains about ilbc frame not being multiple of 50, so i
tried to make it happy, but still misses some translations from
slinear to iLBC and the sound is choppy. What makes iLBC so special
any way?
I just did this
