Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 11, CEL and ConfBridge recordings

2014-03-07 Thread Jairo
Great :) Thank you very much. Best. 2014-03-07 18:07 GMT-03:00 Rusty Newton : > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Jairo wrote: > > Thank you very much Rusty. > > > > It really works. Even if ${MyCustomFileName} gets a different value when > the > > second participant enters the conference, the

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 11, CEL and ConfBridge recordings

2014-03-07 Thread Rusty Newton
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Jairo wrote: > Thank you very much Rusty. > > It really works. Even if ${MyCustomFileName} gets a different value when the > second participant enters the conference, the filename remains the name > defined when the first participant enters (because he started the >

Re: [asterisk-users] High Availability with Asterisk

2014-03-07 Thread Gareth Blades
On 07/03/14 16:52, Johann Steinwendtner wrote: Sorry, for the stupid question, but what happens if Kamailio fails ? We have two copies on different servers which make use of keepalived to provide a virtual IP address between them. We also have them connected to two databases with active-ac

Re: [asterisk-users] High Availability with Asterisk

2014-03-07 Thread Johann Steinwendtner
On 2014-03-07 17:31, Paul Belanger wrote: On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Markus wrote: Hi Thorolf, Am 06.03.2014 16:21, schrieb Thorolf Godawa: Using (para-)virtualization with Xen could be an other option, on systems with low load this works reliable, but what happens on systems with high

Re: [asterisk-users] High Availability with Asterisk

2014-03-07 Thread Adolphe Cher-Aime
Good post. Actually this is the architecture we have. On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Markus wrote: > > Hi Thorolf, > > > > Am 06.03.2014 16:21, schrieb Thorolf Godawa: > > > >> Using (para-)virtualization with Xen could be an other opt

Re: [asterisk-users] High Availability with Asterisk

2014-03-07 Thread Paul Belanger
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Markus wrote: > Hi Thorolf, > > Am 06.03.2014 16:21, schrieb Thorolf Godawa: > >> Using (para-)virtualization with Xen could be an other option, on >> systems with low load this works reliable, but what happens on systems >> with high load? Are there any issues know

Re: [asterisk-users] High Availability with Asterisk

2014-03-07 Thread Paul Belanger
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Mitul Limbani wrote: > Hello, > > Using Single Server with multiple VMs essentially kills the purpose, coz it > doesnt protect against physical hardware failures. > > To save costs, use low end box as failover, to keep u in business, till > primary box goes live. >

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 11, CEL and ConfBridge recordings

2014-03-07 Thread Jairo
Thank you very much Rusty. It really works. Even if ${MyCustomFileName} gets a different value when the second participant enters the conference, the filename remains the name defined when the first participant enters (because he started the conference). Another thing, if I need to know the time

[asterisk-users] Problem with reINVITE on BYE

2014-03-07 Thread David Lam
Hello all. I am currently using Asterisk 11.7.0 (also tried Asterisk 12, but same behavior) and is having an issue when it comes to reINVITE on BYEs. Apparently one of the SIP providers that I am using does not always process reINVITEs correctly, and would return a 500 Internal Server Error message