Mark, you're a darn good coder. . ...
;-)
How about TIP, Telephony Internet Protocol.
Or is that to close to Sip?
Ben
-Original Message-
From: Mark Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2
IAX is short and I like it. Besides if that additional '2' irritates you
then anyways in the near future when IAX2 is working fine ppl will switch
eventually to IAX2 and then we'll refer to IAX2 as IAX
Martin
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Mark Spencer wrote:
What do you all think of renaming IAX2
I like it. It's better than STUN. *grin*
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 09:19:11AM -0600, Mark Spencer wrote:
What do you all think of renaming IAX2 as:
Telephony Authentication, Signalling, and Transport Exchange (TASTE)
TASTE is easy to remember and has a sort of ironic relation to SIP.
Is it
Quoting Mark Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What do you all think of renaming IAX2 as:
Telephony Authentication, Signalling, and Transport Exchange (TASTE)
TASTE is easy to remember and has a sort of ironic relation to SIP.
Is it took hoaky?
Mark
I still live LIVE...
LIghtweight
Voice
PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
What do you all think of renaming IAX2 as:
Telephony Authentication, Signalling, and Transport Exchange (TASTE)
TASTE is easy to remember and has a sort of ironic relation to SIP.
Is it took hoaky?
Mark
LIghtweight
Voice over IP
Exchange
Or:
Lightweight
Internet
Voice
Exchange
Mark
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Denon mentioned to me:
SVP -- Streamlined Voice Protocol
Jeremy
Mark Spencer wrote:
LIghtweight
Voice over IP
Exchange
Or:
Lightweight
Internet
Voice
Exchange
Mark
I still like my original idea, SVP - Streamlined Voice Protocol.
I think the trick to naming IAX2, is to encourage the thought of
streamlined and efficiency. If people want a feature-rich and bloated
protocol, they'll run H.323, SIP, etc .. IAX is all about performance and
resource
I'm in favor of TASTE myself, though Mark's take on LIVE has the
all-important I, to establish the use of this protocol over IP
networks, which is an important part of the protocol and conceptual
structure, yes?
Perhaps ITASTE with the I standing for the obvious Internet.
JT
What do you
Mark and List:
I agree with the earlier post that said keep the name IAX. No we don't
need to go through a progression like Algol60 - Pascal - Modula2 -
Modula3...
To our multi-lingual listers - do IAX or TASTE have any non-English
complications? Remember how much fun General Motors had with
What about ITP
Internet/IP
Telephony
Protocol
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 09:40, Mark Spencer wrote:
LIghtweight
Voice over IP
Exchange
Or:
Lightweight
Internet
Voice
Exchange
Mark
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like the name IAX, only because I want to get call piggybacking
working and call it pigbIAX (pronounced pig beaks). :-)
If I were to chose a new name, TASTE is probably the one I like the
best...
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 08:19, Mark Spencer wrote:
What do you all think of renaming IAX2 as:
Dedicated / Dedicated Servers
BitShop, Inc. - http://www.bitshop.com - $149/month colo special
-Original Message-
From: John Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 1:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
I'm in favor of TASTE
or Packet Telephony (Simple) Protocol
On 13 Mar 2003, Karl Putland wrote:
What about ITP
Internet/IP
Telephony
Protocol
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 09:40, Mark Spencer wrote:
LIghtweight
Voice over IP
Exchange
Or:
Lightweight
Internet
Voice
Exchange
Mark
I agree with the earlier post that said keep the name IAX.
I'm in this camp. It's short, sweet and meaningful. I even like the '2'. And
I just can't stand any more acronyms...
Just out of curiosity, early on in the discussion someone had suggested that
upgrades to iax stream include version
15 matches
Mail list logo
