2015-10-19 22:05 GMT+02:00 Telium Technical Support :
> If you’re still in the planning stage, there’s a lot more to think about.
> Your Asterisk failure detection will be very simplistic (is the process
> dead). Synchronization of data – without risking synchronization of
>
My machines have both a /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/asterisk file
(from resource-agents package, it seems).
If I'm not mistaken, this file is not run when asterisk is started/stopped
by hb_standby/hb_takeover commands (I added a touch /tmp/foobar line in
If you’re still in the planning stage, there’s a lot more to think about. Your
Asterisk failure detection will be very simplistic (is the process dead).
Synchronization of data – without risking synchronization of corrupt data to a
peer. Prevent a deteriorating/failing peer corruption from
Hello,
I'm setting up an active-passive Asterisk solution on Debian Jessie
platforms.
I'm using heartbeat package.
As I'm not yet familiar with either systemd or heartbeat, I've got a couple
of questions:
1. At the moment, I'm using /usr/share/heartbeat/hb_standby or
On 6/6/13 4:53 am, Gopalakrishnan N wrote:
Any other HA applications available or the lsyncd with pacemaker is good?
I generally use Pacemaker with Heartbeat, which seems to work pretty well.
Kind regards,
Chris
--
This email is made from 100% recycled electrons
--
I was go through'ing the following links for HA,
https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/TOP/Failover+-+Linux - which doesn't
have file syncing.
https://www.johncahill.net/wiki/index.php/2_Node_Active/Passive_cluster -
this one has file syncing with pacemaker
Any other HA applications available
From: DHAVAL INDRODIYA dhaval.it01...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk HA for queue calls
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: BANLkTi=ypq1up4ti35-ljzbw9_ju+v9...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset
Hello List,
We are running two asterisk machines in virtual IP as primary and secondary
server.
Initially virtual IP will be active in primary server; during the failure of
primary secondary will get the virtual IP.
Is there any way to retrieve pending queue calls from primary to secondary, in
Hi Rajib,
I think It is not possible with asterisk , as primary server goes down it
will stop asterisk services so once asterisk service down i think all
connected calls to queue will hangup automatically, and you cannot retrive
those calls as they all are disconnected .
I think you need to
Sent: Friday, October 2, 2009 1:58:15 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA Current Thoughts (Centos 5.3 Platform)
I'm looking into doing an HA setup for a Asterisk 1.4 install on
Centos. I've seen a number of different pointers to packages for this
some of which
-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA Current Thoughts (Centos 5.3
Platform)
Google for some of the How Tos built around Elastix and Trixbox. Both of
these are CentOS based as well.
good luck.
- Original Message -
From: James Hankins j...@allpointsmediaworks.com
I'm looking into doing an HA setup for a Asterisk 1.4 install on
Centos. I've seen a number of different pointers to packages for this
some of which are packages that seem quite dated from an update
perspective (Ultra Monkey links I've seen haven't been updated in a
while). What is the
I have been working on a HA procedure for Asterisk on CentOS 5.3, but
haven't had time to publish it. It is a little complex, but here are
the components used:
- CentOS 5.3
- Asterisk 1.6 (version doesn't matter)
- MySQL
- Cluster services
- GFS2
- DRBD
A basic run-down is:
* Two servers
* Two servers configured with DRBD in Master-Master mode. All data is
replicated between the two so in case of a failure there should be
very limited data loss (voicemail) if any at all.
If you put the asterisk spool, lib, and config files on the DRBD then
you shouldn't lose voicemail or any
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Fred Posner f...@teamforrest.com wrote:
* Two servers configured with DRBD in Master-Master mode. All data is
replicated between the two so in case of a failure there should be
very limited data loss (voicemail) if any at all.
If you put the asterisk spool,
2007/1/11, Ale [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ciao,
Enrico Pasqualotto wrote:
Is better ultramonkey, dundi or SER proxy in front of * server?
You can also consider Hartbeat + rsync, or simply pfsync + rsync ;)
The problem with Asterisk HA, is mainly the lost of calls when
failover occurs. This is
Ciao,
Enrico Pasqualotto wrote:
Is better ultramonkey, dundi or SER proxy in front of * server?
You can also consider Hartbeat + rsync, or simply pfsync + rsync ;)
Thanks Enrico
Ciao Ciao ,
Ale
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by
Hi all, I have to make for a client an asterisk system for process up to
250 calls between conference and normal call.
At disposition I have 4 xserver 346 with dual xeon 3.0Ghz and the client
require a failover system.
Anyone have experience for this type of solution?
Is better ultramonkey,
18 matches
Mail list logo