: [asterisk-users] Fax solution for Asterisk
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Steve Totaro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Lee Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Steve Totaro wrote:
>>> You may need an additional
>>> server
Steve Totaro
Sent: Wednesday, 21 May 2008 10:55 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Fax solution for Asterisk
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Sanjay Rajdev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We would like to do something similar to efax, whe
Gordon Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> RxFAX gets one step closer to the data stream (no copper/IP in the
> way), so why are people using (& suggesting) Hylafax over RxFAX?
When we piloted our deployment, rxfax didn't manage to receive faxes
correctly as often as Hylafax did. We never fou
Gordon Henderson wrote:
> Something that's always confused me - IAXmodem is built on spandsp. RxFAX
> is also built on spandsp. RxFAX gets one step closer to the data stream
> (no copper/IP in the way), so why are people using (& suggesting) Hylafax
> over RxFAX?
>
spandsp includes a lot of
Benny Amorsen wrote:
> Now, what's the story on Hylafax+? How is that different from Hylafax?
See:
http://hylafax.sourceforge.net/about.php
Thanks,
Lee.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing
2008/5/22 Gordon Henderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>:
> On Thu, 22 May 2008, Benny Amorsen wrote:
>
> > "Steve Totaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> Then check out Hylafax and IAXmodem. Hylafax has alot of client apps
> >> too. As I said before, it is CPU intensive, so you m
On Thu, 22 May 2008, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> "Steve Totaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Then check out Hylafax and IAXmodem. Hylafax has alot of client apps
>> too. As I said before, it is CPU intensive, so you may need separate
>> machines to handle fax. A direct crossover cable for networ
"Steve Totaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Then check out Hylafax and IAXmodem. Hylafax has alot of client apps
> too. As I said before, it is CPU intensive, so you may need separate
> machines to handle fax. A direct crossover cable for network is the
> best to eliminate any latency.
If you
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Steve Totaro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Lee Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Steve Totaro wrote:
>>> You may need an additional
>>> server just to handle faxes if you are running many instances as they
>>> are CPU intensive.
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Lee Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Totaro wrote:
>> You may need an additional
>> server just to handle faxes if you are running many instances as they
>> are CPU intensive.
>
> iaxmodem is not CPU intensive. 100 of them aren't. You can put that
> many
Steve Totaro wrote:
> You may need an additional
> server just to handle faxes if you are running many instances as they
> are CPU intensive.
iaxmodem is not CPU intensive. 100 of them aren't. You can put that
many on a typical modern machine and have them all faxing simultaneously
and not see
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Sanjay Rajdev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We would like to do something similar to efax, where we can send mail to
> send fax or something similar. I tried to install Asterisk Fax
> http://asterfax.sourceforge.net/ but was not able to compile it with
> Asterisk 1.
List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Cc: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 8:21:38 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai,
New Delhi
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Fax solution for Asterisk
We would like to do something similar to
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Niles Ingalls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On May 21, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Sanjay Rajdev wrote:
>
> We are using Asterisk 1.4.13 on FC6 and have a T1 card with 20 DID's.
> We are wanting to use one of the DID's for Fax, is this possible or do we
> have to add some a
On May 21, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Sanjay Rajdev wrote:
We are using Asterisk 1.4.13 on FC6 and have a T1 card with 20 DID's.
We are wanting to use one of the DID's for Fax, is this possible or
do we have to add some addition Hardware and what is the best way to
do this.
I know that similar thing
SpanDSP.
Regards,
Sanjay Rajdev
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Totaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 8:12:20 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai,
New Delhi
Subject
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Sanjay Rajdev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about outbound faxing.
>
> Regards,
> Sanjay Rajdev
>
How about it? Describe your needs. There are different ways of doing
the same thing, it all depends on needs.
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
i,
New Delhi
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Fax solution for Asterisk
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Lee Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sanjay Rajdev wrote:
>> We are using Asterisk 1.4.13 on FC6 and have a T1 card with 20 DID's.
>> We are wanting to use one of t
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Lee Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sanjay Rajdev wrote:
>> We are using Asterisk 1.4.13 on FC6 and have a T1 card with 20 DID's.
>> We are wanting to use one of the DID's for Fax, is this possible or do
>> we have to add some addition Hardware and what is the
Sanjay Rajdev wrote:
> We are using Asterisk 1.4.13 on FC6 and have a T1 card with 20 DID's.
> We are wanting to use one of the DID's for Fax, is this possible or do
> we have to add some addition Hardware and what is the best way to do this.
http://iaxmodem.sourceforge.net
Thanks,
Lee.
__
We are using Asterisk 1.4.13 on FC6 and have a T1 card with 20 DID's.
We are wanting to use one of the DID's for Fax, is this possible or do we have
to add some addition Hardware and what is the best way to do this.
I know that similar thing would have been asked multiple time already, but I
wa
21 matches
Mail list logo
