Nevermind I found a note about “Hint”
which can be used for this purpose.
Bill
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Gibbs
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005
11:52 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk
The SNOM
320’s with 12 buttons work fine and they are relatively inexpensive, although
the indications are not as fine grained as on the Cisco. Basically light on=in use,
light off=not in use.
You get
into diminishing returns on the value of a line indicator sidecar in inverse proporti
> I have a question about getting multi-line receptionist
> phones working.
> I was thinking about getting one of these expansion ports:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/phones/ps379/products_d
> ata_sheet09186a008008883d.html
> What are people using for receptionist phones that show all
With CVS, you also get a flashing led when the
phone is ringing.
PaulH
- Original Message -
From:
Colin Anderson
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion'
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 4:24
AM
Subject: RE: [Aste
Yes, I keep reading on the mailing list archives and the wikis that
(wether or not it is indeed a Asterisk issue) Polycom keeps saying
that an issue with Asterisk prevents you from monitoring more than 7
total (not per sidecar) extensions.
Daniel
On Mar 27, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Justin Moore
Discussion"
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 6:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
> Yes, I keep reading on the mailing list archives and the wikis that
> (wether or not it is indeed a Asterisk issue) Polycom keeps saying
> that an issue with Asterisk prevents you
Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 6:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
Yes, I keep reading on the mailing list archives and the wikis that
(wether or not it is indeed a Asterisk issue) Polycom keeps saying
that an issue with Asterisk prevents
: "Darrell Long" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
> Do you have experience with the Snom phones? We have not had much
> success getting
Hmm, which phone from Snom are you using for this? I've looked
around their website and I can only find 3 VoIP phones, the 300, 320
and 360. The 360 by the looks of it only has 12 buttons you can
assign to different extensions; am I missing something or is that the
phone and you just do 1
, 2006 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
> Hmm, which phone from Snom are you using for this? I've looked
> around their website and I can only find 3 VoIP phones, the 300, 320
> and 360. The 360 by the looks of it only has 12 buttons you can
> assign to diff
The 360 has an expansion unit. It adds 42 extensions.
Darrell S. Long
BestWeb Corporation
Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
Hmm, which phone from Snom are you using for this? I've looked around
their website and I can only find 3 VoIP phones, the 300, 320 and 360.
The 360 by the looks of it on
: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
The 360 has an expansion unit. It adds 42 extensions.
Darrell S. Long
BestWeb Corporation
Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
> Hmm, which phone from Snom are you using for this? I've looked around
> their website and I can only find 3 VoIP phones, the 3
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 4:32 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
The 360 has an expansion unit. It adds 42 extensions.
Darrell S. Long
BestWeb Corporation
Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
Hmm, which phone from
Bob McDowell wrote:
> Can you chain these to get more that 42 buttons? I need about 60...
>
>
> Bob McDowell
42+12 is fairly near the 60 target.
--
Best regards
Peer Oliver Schmidt
PGP Key ID: 0x83E1C2EA
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by
ceptionist not having
a sidecar is present my fault, due to lack of finding a good one.
Bob McDowell
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peer
Oliver Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 9:50 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Comme
What I read on snom's website was the _currently_ only one sidecar
can be hooked up at a time. It sounds like they are working on
getting multiple sidecars chained together but have not got all of
the bugs worked out. I am kind of in the same boat. Our current
system offers 60 buttons on
terisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
>
> We installed a snom with 3 sidecars. Kinda worked, but had so
> many quirks they had us replace with a Polycom. All their
> other phones were of the poly variety. We i
rch 28, 2006 8:47 PM
> To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
>
> So how did the Polycom with sidecars work? I like the idea
> of a dedicated FOP display but not sure why you would n
For those of us that only need a small handful of these receptionist
phones (for me it is 2), it should not be nearly as much of a
problem, correct? For example I only need 2 phones with 60 (well, I
can get 54 atm, but would like to expand even more). Assuming
everybody picked up their ph
- yes I am from snom.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
mustardman29
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 8:47 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
We installed a snom with 3 sidecars. Kinda worked, but had so
many quirks they had us replace with a Polycom. All their
other phones were of the poly variety. We installed a
dedicated lcd running FOP for display. Receptionist was
cussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
>
> The reality is, of course, that telephone systems have
> provided this function for many years. A DSS/BLF is available
> on MANY so called legacy systems, so until this function is
> readily available , customers
g List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
>
> Because we still have to live with - the current - seven only
> limitation.
>
> We have found that training generally results in folks
> understanding how to use a PBX vs a key system
>
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: mustardman29 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 4:08 PM
> To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
>
>
> Could you please e
2006/3/29, John Novack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The reality is, of course, that telephone systems have provided thisfunction for many years. A DSS/BLF is available on MANY so called legacysystems, so until this function is readily available , customers that
require a receptionist will continue to go el
Olivier Krief wrote:
2006/3/29, John Novack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The
reality is, of course, that telephone systems have provided this
function for many years. A DSS/BLF is available on MANY so called legacy
systems, so until this function is readily available , customers that
require a rec
I've been quiet on this discussion for a few days and reading
everybody's thoughts. But since I brought this subject up in the
first place I thought I would bring it to a close with the results
summarized.
1. The polycom phones do support attendant stations, but there is
some incompatibi
We would be interested in the same. We have had only limited success
getting Snom's phones to do this. And, you're right, this is such a
common thing, there MUST be something out there that can do the job.
Darrell S. Long
BestWeb Corporation
Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
Thanks for all the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel
Hazelbaker
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 1:32 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones (was 3Com Phones)
Thanks for all the c
We may end up using a software solution, but there are two main
issues with a software solution (for us at least):
1) For us in particular, our receptionists have ALWAYS (for the past
15 years at least) used a physical switchboard style for "routing"
and seeing availability. From past hard
On 3/27/06, Daniel Hazelbaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have seen that the polycom setup (601+sidecar) works but only for up to 7
> phones
From what I've seen, each sidecar supports up to 14 additional
stations. Three of those along with the 5 buttons on the 601 comes up
to 47 on my calculat
31 matches
Mail list logo
