Oops, sorry.
My explanation was not clear. I replaced that function in
the codecs/Makefile in asterisk.
I will attach the modified your patch.
I hope this explanation helps.
--
Xiu YuShen
2007/4/4, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 06:50:50PM +0900, Xiu YuShen wrote:
>
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 06:50:50PM +0900, Xiu YuShen wrote:
> 2007/3/17, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=9303
> >
> >Please test.
>
> I tested this patch to asterisk-1.2.17 with zaptel-1.2.10 and redhat 9.
>
> However, to compile on my environment, 'first
I tested this patch to asterisk-1.2.17 with zaptel-1.2.10 and redhat 9.
However, to compile on my environment, 'first' function was replaced
by the 'firstword' function.
Regards,
Xiu
--
Xiu YuShen
2007/3/17, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 11:28:43AM -0400, Sean Br
I would check to see if you had the latest version of the zaptel library for
the version of asterisk you are trying to compile.
> Has this issue been resolved? I'm having the problem now with the code
base downloaded yesterday.
I should have said "the code base for zaptel and asterisk I downl
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 11:43:21PM -0400, John Novack wrote:
>
>
> Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:55:56PM -0400, John Novack wrote:
> >
> >>Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 11:28:43AM -0400, Sean Bright wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> Whats the non-
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:55:56PM -0400, John Novack wrote:
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 11:28:43AM -0400, Sean Bright wrote:
Whats the non-workaround solution? Is there one?
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=9303
Please
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:55:56PM -0400, John Novack wrote:
>
>
> Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 11:28:43AM -0400, Sean Bright wrote:
> >
> >>Whats the non-workaround solution? Is there one?
> >>
> >
> >http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=9303
> >
> >Please test.
> >
> >Wa
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 11:28:43AM -0400, Sean Bright wrote:
Whats the non-workaround solution? Is there one?
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=9303
Please test.
Wasn't there an existing issue on this one?
The bug traker says, to me at least, that this proble
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 11:28:43AM -0400, Sean Bright wrote:
> Whats the non-workaround solution? Is there one?
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=9303
Please test.
Wasn't there an existing issue on this one?
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 11:28:43AM -0400, Sean Bright wrote:
> Whats the non-workaround solution? Is there one?
I haven't really tested, but it should be along the lines of:
Index: codecs/Makefile
===
--- codecs/Makefile (revisi
Whats the non-workaround solution? Is there one?
On 3/16/07, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 02:46:24PM +0100, Wilson Pickett wrote:
> Has this issue been resolved? I'm having the problem now with the code
base
> downloaded yesterday.
>
> On 2/3/07, Erick Perez
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 02:46:24PM +0100, Wilson Pickett wrote:
> Has this issue been resolved? I'm having the problem now with the code base
> downloaded yesterday.
>
> On 2/3/07, Erick Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >while compiling svn 53132 of asterisk branch 1.2
> >codec_zap.o codec_
I would check to see if you had the latest version of the zaptel library for
the version of asterisk you are trying to compile.
On 3/16/07, Wilson Pickett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has this issue been resolved? I'm having the problem now with the code
base downloaded yesterday.
On 2/3/07, Eri
Has this issue been resolved? I'm having the problem now with the code base
downloaded yesterday.
On 2/3/07, Erick Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
while compiling svn 53132 of asterisk branch 1.2
gcc -pipe -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wmissing-declarations -g3 -Iinclude
14 matches
Mail list logo
