Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: apply coverage class on slottime too

2013-04-22 Thread John W. Linville
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:15:56PM +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2013-04-22 12:08 PM, Simon Wunderlich wrote: > > Hey Felix, > > > > just wanted to bump on this issue again, as it has not been applied > > yet - the patch seems still valid, and Mathias results appear to show > > that as well. Wh

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: apply coverage class on slottime too

2013-04-22 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2013-04-22 12:08 PM, Simon Wunderlich wrote: > Hey Felix, > > just wanted to bump on this issue again, as it has not been applied > yet - the patch seems still valid, and Mathias results appear to show > that as well. What do you think? Looks ok to me, let's get it merged. - Felix ___

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: apply coverage class on slottime too

2013-04-22 Thread Simon Wunderlich
Hey Felix, just wanted to bump on this issue again, as it has not been applied yet - the patch seems still valid, and Mathias results appear to show that as well. What do you think? Thanks, Simon On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 01:35:49PM +0100, Mathias Kretschmer wrote: > Hi all, > > On 10/30/

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: apply coverage class on slottime too

2012-12-07 Thread Mathias Kretschmer
Hi all, On 10/30/2012 01:43 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2012-10-30 1:07 PM, Simon Wunderlich wrote: >> From: Mathias Kretschmer >> >> According to 802.11-2007 17.3.8.6 (slot time), the slot time should >> be increased by 3 us * coverage class. The code only increased the >> ack timeout, which i

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: apply coverage class on slottime too

2012-11-28 Thread Simon Wunderlich
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 02:24:21PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: > [...] > > When I ran the test, the throughput degradation was so big that the > links became almost useless. It was a long time ago, so maybe this was > caused by another bug that has been fixed since. I will run another test > with t

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: apply coverage class on slottime too

2012-10-31 Thread Mathias Kretschmer
On 10/30/2012 02:24 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2012-10-30 2:00 PM, Mathias Kretschmer wrote: >> On 10/30/2012 01:43 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: >>> On 2012-10-30 1:07 PM, Simon Wunderlich wrote: From: Mathias Kretschmer According to 802.11-2007 17.3.8.6 (slot time), the slot time sh

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: apply coverage class on slottime too

2012-10-30 Thread Mathias Kretschmer
On 10/30/2012 01:43 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2012-10-30 1:07 PM, Simon Wunderlich wrote: >> From: Mathias Kretschmer >> >> According to 802.11-2007 17.3.8.6 (slot time), the slot time should >> be increased by 3 us * coverage class. The code only increased the >> ack timeout, which is fixed b

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: apply coverage class on slottime too

2012-10-30 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2012-10-30 2:00 PM, Mathias Kretschmer wrote: > On 10/30/2012 01:43 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: >> On 2012-10-30 1:07 PM, Simon Wunderlich wrote: >>> From: Mathias Kretschmer >>> >>> According to 802.11-2007 17.3.8.6 (slot time), the slot time should >>> be increased by 3 us * coverage class. The

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: apply coverage class on slottime too

2012-10-30 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2012-10-30 1:07 PM, Simon Wunderlich wrote: > From: Mathias Kretschmer > > According to 802.11-2007 17.3.8.6 (slot time), the slot time should > be increased by 3 us * coverage class. The code only increased the > ack timeout, which is fixed by this patch. > > We have noticed in our long shot

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: apply coverage class on slottime too

2012-10-30 Thread Simon Wunderlich
From: Mathias Kretschmer According to 802.11-2007 17.3.8.6 (slot time), the slot time should be increased by 3 us * coverage class. The code only increased the ack timeout, which is fixed by this patch. We have noticed in our long shot scenario that we see less collisions with this patch. Signe