Hi Arash,
> Arash Esbati writes:
> no, \B is not really necessary, I just wanted to say that appending \b
> to the complete regexp would not work for \[; it would be \B or
> nothing. And dropping \B is more versatile.
Thank you for clarifying. That agrees with my thought.
> (defun LaTeX-
Ikumi Keita writes:
>> Arash Esbati writes:
>
>> You need \B to match the end of a "not-word". What do you think about a
>> change like this?
>
> I think your approach is basically OK. (I vaguely remember
> font-latex.el uses similar methods for building regexp.)
>
> (1) I'm wondering whet
Hi Arash,
2017-03-31 9:38 GMT+02:00 Arash Esbati :
> Mosè Giordano writes:
>
>> I think we all came up with similar solutions. I was concerned about
>> performance of Arash's fix, but according to `benchmark-run' the
>> overhead isn't large (slowdown of the order of few percents) and
>> shouldn'
Sorry, I should have thought more flexibly.
> Ikumi Keita writes:
> So I propose to change the `concat' part like this:
> (concat (regexp-quote TeX-esc) "\\(?:"
> (regexp-opt cmds "\\(?:")
> "\\b"
> "\\|"
> (regexp-opt symbs "\\(?:")
>
Hi Arash,
> Arash Esbati writes:
> You need \B to match the end of a "not-word". What do you think about a
> change like this?
I think your approach is basically OK. (I vaguely remember
font-latex.el uses similar methods for building regexp.)
Let me make some comments on this code.
> \d
Mosè Giordano writes:
> I think we all came up with similar solutions. I was concerned about
> performance of Arash's fix, but according to `benchmark-run' the
> overhead isn't large (slowdown of the order of few percents) and
> shouldn't be noticeable in normal situations.
Hi Mosè,
thanks for
Hi all,
first of all, thanks to Adam for the report and the correct guess
about the culprit!
I think we all came up with similar solutions. I was concerned about
performance of Arash's fix, but according to `benchmark-run' the
overhead isn't large (slowdown of the order of few percents) and
shou
Ikumi Keita writes:
>> a...@cock.li writes:
>
> [summary]
> Since the list `LaTeX-paragraph-commands-internal' includes "par",
> `paragraph-start' is set to the regexp which matches the every string
> "\par" in the buffer, even if it is the first four letters of
> "\parencite".
Hi Keita,
yo
Hi Adam and all,
> a...@cock.li writes:
> In auctex-mode, given
> asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf
> \parencite{asdf}
> after calling `fill-paragraph` I get the following
> asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf
> \parencite{asdf}
>
Hello everybody,
In auctex-mode, given
--8<---cut here---start->8---
asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf
\parencite{asdf}
--8<---cut here---end--->8---
after calling `fill-paragraph` I get the f
10 matches
Mail list logo