Re: [aur-general] Merge/Removal request: thunar

2013-06-30 Thread Diego Principe
2013/6/30 Diego Principe > I believe that is not useful to have a non-maintained and old development > version > for thunar... I think that they should be merged keeping the git version > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-devel/ > into > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-git >

[aur-general] Deletion package stegano-git

2013-06-30 Thread Simone Solinas
Hi, I ask the deletion of the package *Stegano-git* due to the change of name. -- Simone Solinas

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2013-06-30 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days

[aur-general] move split2flac-git to split2flac

2013-06-30 Thread member graysky
Upstream has finally started tagging releases. Please replace the git package with the standard one I just uploaded. Thanks!

[aur-general] Orphan request: dfu-util

2013-06-30 Thread Øyvind Heggstad
dfu-util[1] needs updating and the current maintainer is not responding to comments nor email (email sent 20130618) [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dfu-util/

[aur-general] Merge request: win7-8 theme

2013-06-30 Thread Diego Principe
Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/win7-8-theme/ in https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-win7-8/ Diego

[aur-general] Merge request : php-gtk

2013-06-30 Thread Xorg
Hello, Please merge php-gtk (package is old, orphan, dependencies are bad and package can't compile) into php-gtk-git. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-gtk/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-gtk-git/ Best Regards X0rg Portion de message joint Description: PGP signature

[aur-general] Removal request

2013-06-30 Thread Evan Teitelman
Could you please merge 'xsser' (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xsser/) into 'xsser-svn' (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xsser-svn/)? The original 'xsser' package should have been named 'xsser-svn'. The original uploader made a new package called 'xsser-svn' and disowned 'xsser'.

Re: [aur-general] Icons pack naming guidelines

2013-06-30 Thread Edoardo Maria Elidoro
Well, I found only almost 100 packages with $name-icon-theme. I think it would be safe to modify/create a rule so that the new packages need to be: icon-theme-$name(-$de) As soon as we finish the discussion I can contact every maintainer and point he/she to this conversation and to the new guidelin

Re: [aur-general] Icons pack naming guidelines

2013-06-30 Thread Jerome Leclanche
You should double-check some other icon themes which ship as "*-icons". Eg. oxygen-icons. J. Leclanche On 30 June 2013 23:54, Edoardo Maria Elidoro wrote: > Well, I found only almost 100 packages with $name-icon-theme. > I think it would be safe to modify/create a rule so that the new > package

[aur-general] Removal requests

2013-06-30 Thread Karol Blazewicz
Source gone https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/indicator-lookit/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/imwheel-enchanced/ - the diff is gone, w/o it it's a plain imwheel: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/imwheel/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ispell-czech/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/isp

Re: [aur-general] Icons pack naming guidelines

2013-06-30 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 2013-06-29 15:07, Alex Charron wrote: > I think that we should modify the convention so that it goes as > icon-theme-*, gtk-theme-*, etc. so that it sorts better. > What do you mean by "sort better"? What difference is there between "icon-theme-*" and "*-icon-theme"? AUR has search, so it's pr

Re: [aur-general] move split2flac-git to split2flac

2013-06-30 Thread William Giokas
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 07:44:14AM -0400, graysky wrote: > Upstream has finally started tagging releases. Please replace the git > package with the standard one I just uploaded. Thanks! I see no reason to do this. Set up a good pkgver function using git describe and have it conflict with the non-