[aur-general] deletion request

2013-08-21 Thread Alexej Magura
Could yall please delete /nocp/, I'm the developer, and I thought that /nocp/was fully functional and ready to be packaged, but upon further testing today I realized that it's hardly functional at all, which is pretty dang disappointing. Anyway, here's a link to the AUR package page thingy.

[aur-general] A simple introduction

2013-08-21 Thread Tanner Danzey
Since I've never really learned mailing list etiquette, I'm not sure this is the right place. Nevertheless... My name is Tanner, currently residing in strange-weathered Fargo, ND. I work as a support technician / system engineer at a local managed service provider. We use Linux for anything tha

Re: [aur-general] [Delete request] - miltilame

2013-08-21 Thread Maxime GAUDUIN
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:50 AM, member graysky wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/multilame/ > > This was a script I wrote a while ago but have abandoned upstream. Other > packages do the same only with tagging. Please delete. > Deleted, thx. -- Maxime

[aur-general] [Delete request] - miltilame

2013-08-21 Thread member graysky
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/multilame/ This was a script I wrote a while ago but have abandoned upstream. Other packages do the same only with tagging. Please delete.

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH 2/2] Add details on patch submissions

2013-08-21 Thread Dave Reisner
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 05:45:50PM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:07:47PM +, Xyne wrote: > > On 2013-08-20 18:14 +0200 > > Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > > > >+SVP is commenced at the time of the motion, with a discussion period of 5 > > >days, > > >+a quorum of 75%, a

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH 2/2] Add details on patch submissions

2013-08-21 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:07:47PM +, Xyne wrote: > On 2013-08-20 18:14 +0200 > Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > >+SVP is commenced at the time of the motion, with a discussion period of 5 > >days, > >+a quorum of 75%, and a voting period of 7 days. > > > Use the same formulation as the "Removal

Re: [aur-general] Removal request arpscan

2013-08-21 Thread Maxime GAUDUIN
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Levente Polyak wrote: > Please remove orphan duplicate arpscan from aur, its in community as > arp-scan. > AUR maintainer commented before disown but missed to issue a removal > request. > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arpscan > > Best regards, > Levente >

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH 2/2] Add details on patch submissions

2013-08-21 Thread Xyne
On 2013-08-20 18:14 +0200 Lukas Fleischer wrote: >+SVP is commenced at the time of the motion, with a discussion period of 5 >days, >+a quorum of 75%, and a voting period of 7 days. Use the same formulation as the "Removal of a TU" section: >Following the motion, standard voting procedure comme

[aur-general] Removal request arpscan

2013-08-21 Thread Levente Polyak
Please remove orphan duplicate arpscan from aur, its in community as arp-scan. AUR maintainer commented before disown but missed to issue a removal request. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arpscan Best regards, Levente

Re: [aur-general] Tuxtype or tuxtyping

2013-08-21 Thread Xyne
On 2013-08-20 08:04 +0100 Jonathan Steel wrote: >On Mon 19 Aug 2013 at 22:36, Storm Dragon wrote: >> Hi, >> Awesome, thanks, works great. Why is this pkg not the one in the AUR? Just >> curious. >> Thanks > >It's up to the maintainer to update the package. You could send them an >email to chase t

Re: [aur-general] Two merge requests

2013-08-21 Thread Felix Yan
On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 12:32:16 Dobrosław Kijowski wrote: > Please merge: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/transmission-remote-gui/ into > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/transmission-remote-gui-gtk2/ > and > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lazpaint/ into > https://aur.archlinux.or

[aur-general] Two merge requests

2013-08-21 Thread Dobrosław Kijowski
Please merge: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/transmission-remote-gui/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/transmission-remote-gui-gtk2/ and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lazpaint/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lazpaint-qt4/ Thanks in advance. Have a nice day.

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Resetting password (?)

2013-08-21 Thread Felix Yan
On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 11:24:22 Anton Hvornum wrote: > Whenever i try to use this feature, it just gets back to me with nothing. > It says i should check my inbox (and spam ofc) but nothing is delivered, i > need to update some AUR stuff but i can't because the password is forgotten > and i

[aur-general] Fwd: Resetting password (?)

2013-08-21 Thread Anton Hvornum
Whenever i try to use this feature, it just gets back to me with nothing. It says i should check my inbox (and spam ofc) but nothing is delivered, i need to update some AUR stuff but i can't because the password is forgotten and i need to reset it. outbound e-mails stuck in the pipe? Best regards

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2013-08-21 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 12 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 day

Re: [aur-general] Removal request sleuthkit++

2013-08-21 Thread Felix Yan
On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 00:29:29 Levente Polyak wrote: > Please delete aur/sleuthkit++ (3.2.3) as it is an orphaned outdated duplicate > of community/sleuthkit (4.0.2). > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sleuthkit++ > > Best regards, > Levente Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan sig