[aur-general] Packaging a Ruby application (veewee) with embedded gems (no dependency on Arch ruby-* packages)

2014-04-10 Thread Bertrand Bonnefoy-Claudet
Hello, veewee [1] is a great tool for building vagrant boxes. Unfortunately, it depends on many other gems. I've already built a package ruby-veewee [2] using Arch packages as dependencies and there is a git version, veewee-git [3], but I find them unsatisfactory because of how difficult they are

Re: [aur-general] Packaging a Ruby application (veewee) with embedded gems (no dependency on Arch ruby-* packages)

2014-04-10 Thread Anatol Pomozov
Hi On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Bertrand Bonnefoy-Claudet wrote: > Hello, > > veewee [1] is a great tool for building vagrant boxes. Unfortunately, it > depends on many other gems. I've already built a package ruby-veewee [2] > using Arch packages as dependencies and there is a git version,

Re: [aur-general] Packaging a Ruby application (veewee) with embedded gems (no dependency on Arch ruby-* packages)

2014-04-10 Thread Jonathan Steel
On Thu 10 Apr 2014 at 20:42, Bertrand Bonnefoy-Claudet wrote: > [...] > > vagrant has recently been accepted in community and has a PKGBUILD that > I find peculiar. It seems like it uses some embedded directory to store > gems it depends on. [...] There wasn't really a choice; I intended to insta