Re: [aur-general] VCS dupes in the AUR

2011-04-24 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 11.04.2011 23:13, Stefan Husmann wrote: > Am 11.04.2011 12:15, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: >> Following package lists were created by `aurdupes -V`, removing false >> positives (like "git-hg" and "bzr-svn"/"bzr-git") and grouping packages >> by removal categories. >> >> These packages should most l

Re: [aur-general] VCS dupes in the AUR

2011-04-14 Thread jwbirdsong
On 04/14/2011 09:19 AM, Peter Lewis wrote: On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, J. W. Birdsong wrote: On 04/12/11 at 10:00pm, Stefan Husmann wrote: On 12.04.2011 08:58, Peter Lewis wrote: Done a bit of research... On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Stefan Husmann wrote: irssi (VCS) * irssi-svn https://aur.archlinux.org

Re: [aur-general] VCS dupes in the AUR

2011-04-14 Thread Peter Lewis
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:45:52PM +0200, Martti Kühne wrote: > > +1 for *-git vcs dupes to stay, where upstream vcs is a different one. > > -1 for removal of vcs dupes in general, since apparently different > > people prefer different vcs. Besides, ho

Re: [aur-general] VCS dupes in the AUR

2011-04-14 Thread Peter Lewis
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, J. W. Birdsong wrote: > On 04/12/11 at 10:00pm, Stefan Husmann wrote: > > On 12.04.2011 08:58, Peter Lewis wrote: > > >Done a bit of research... > > > > > >On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Stefan Husmann wrote: > > >> irssi (VCS) * irssi-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6163

Re: [aur-general] VCS dupes in the AUR

2011-04-14 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:45:52PM +0200, Martti Kühne wrote: > +1 for *-git vcs dupes to stay, where upstream vcs is a different one. > -1 for removal of vcs dupes in general, since apparently different > people prefer different vcs. Besides, how much space are these taking > all together? 600Kb?

Re: [aur-general] VCS dupes in the AUR

2011-04-14 Thread Martti Kühne
+1 for *-git vcs dupes to stay, where upstream vcs is a different one. -1 for removal of vcs dupes in general, since apparently different people prefer different vcs. Besides, how much space are these taking all together? 600Kb? regards mar77i

Re: [aur-general] VCS dupes in the AUR

2011-04-13 Thread J. W. Birdsong
On 04/12/11 at 10:00pm, Stefan Husmann wrote: > On 12.04.2011 08:58, Peter Lewis wrote: > >Done a bit of research... > > > >On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Stefan Husmann wrote: > >> irssi (VCS) > >> * irssi-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6163 > >> * irssi-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packa

Re: [aur-general] VCS dupes in the AUR

2011-04-12 Thread Stefan Husmann
On 12.04.2011 08:58, Peter Lewis wrote: Done a bit of research... On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Stefan Husmann wrote: irssi (VCS) * irssi-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6163 * irssi-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25781 These both seem "official", though the main web

Re: [aur-general] VCS dupes in the AUR

2011-04-11 Thread Peter Lewis
Done a bit of research... On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Stefan Husmann wrote: > irssi (VCS) > * irssi-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6163 > * irssi-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25781 These both seem "official", though the main website points to the SVN repo and not the g

Re: [aur-general] VCS dupes in the AUR

2011-04-11 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 11.04.2011 12:15, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: > Following package lists were created by `aurdupes -V`, removing false > positives (like "git-hg" and "bzr-svn"/"bzr-git") and grouping packages > by removal categories. > > These packages should most likely be removed (flagged out of date or new > VC

Re: [aur-general] VCS dupes in the AUR

2011-04-11 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 11.04.2011 16:29, schrieb Andrzej Giniewicz: > Hi, > > I actually wanted to do this for some time, but this email inspired me > to do so now. There are some of my old packages, i.e. all python-ets*. > They also should be deleted because Enthough moved all development > efforts to git now and dr

Re: [aur-general] VCS dupes in the AUR

2011-04-11 Thread Ray Rashif
On 11 April 2011 18:15, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > * schismtracker-cvs https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19499 > * scikits-audiolab-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21018 > * supercollider-git-with-plugins-svn > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43637 > * qjackctl-cvs h

Re: [aur-general] VCS dupes in the AUR

2011-04-11 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Hi, I actually wanted to do this for some time, but this email inspired me to do so now. There are some of my old packages, i.e. all python-ets*. They also should be deleted because Enthough moved all development efforts to git now and dropped few packages which wouldn't be evolving any more (new

Re: [aur-general] VCS dupes in the AUR

2011-04-11 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 11.04.2011 12:32, schrieb Stefan Husmann: > Am 11.04.2011 12:15, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: >> Following package lists were created by `aurdupes -V`, removing false >> positives (like "git-hg" and "bzr-svn"/"bzr-git") and grouping packages >> by removal categories. >> >> These packages should most

Re: [aur-general] VCS dupes in the AUR

2011-04-11 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On Monday 11 April 2011 12:32:12 Stefan Husmann wrote: > Wow, I never would have guessed that the list is so long. I removed some. +1 I removed some KDE stuff too. -- Andrea

Re: [aur-general] VCS dupes in the AUR

2011-04-11 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 11.04.2011 12:15, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: > Following package lists were created by `aurdupes -V`, removing false > positives (like "git-hg" and "bzr-svn"/"bzr-git") and grouping packages > by removal categories. > > These packages should most likely be removed (flagged out of date or new > VC

[aur-general] VCS dupes in the AUR

2011-04-11 Thread Lukas Fleischer
Following package lists were created by `aurdupes -V`, removing false positives (like "git-hg" and "bzr-svn"/"bzr-git") and grouping packages by removal categories. These packages should most likely be removed (flagged out of date or new VCS repository announced in comments section, plus there's a