The Solaris posix_spawnp() system call implementation does has an action to
change chdir and it will actually search the PATH in the kernel.
While the kernel has the ability the execute the file actions after the
exec as we are still in control, the native syscall posix_spawn
implementation
Date:Wed, 6 May 2020 13:20:40 +0100
From:Geoff Clare
Message-ID: <20200506122040.GA24339@lt2.masqnet>
| Why so averse to what is obviously the simplest and cleanest solution?
Simple, perhaps (certainly for the libc code, not so much for the kernel)
clean, not even
Date:Wed, 06 May 2020 20:07:00 +0700
From:Robert Elz
Message-ID: <18112.1588770...@jinx.noi.kre.to>
| OK, will do that (though what that will be is already there...)
Now done. See note 4866. The final text I didn't include as it
would be identical to what is
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1340
==
Reported By:shware_systems
Assigned To:
Date:Wed, 6 May 2020 11:49:13 +0100
From:Geoff Clare
Message-ID: <20200506104913.GA21901@lt2.masqnet>
| There have certainly been bug resolutions in the past that have
| included "move xxx to after yyy" type instructions. They are rare
| because it's unusual to
Robert Elz wrote, on 06 May 2020:
>
> | On such a system, presumably posix_spawnp() would be a C
> | library function
>
> Yes, so it is.
>
> | that calls a posix_spawnp system call passing it the value
> | of PATH as an extra argument.
>
> but no, no thanks, we will not be putting
Robert Elz wrote, on 06 May 2020:
>
> | - it would be helpful if you could propose the changes you want in smaller
> | chunks so there is less unchanged text to compare.)
>
> I can do that, and will do ... but I am not sure in which form to
> do that. What I see normally is stuff like
>
>
Date:Wed, 6 May 2020 08:47:56 +
From:Austin Group Bug Tracker
Message-ID:
| The new specified behaviour is what naturally happens if posix_spawn() and
| posix_spawnp() are implemented using fork and exec, as in the XRAT B.3.3
| example implementation of
Date:Wed, 6 May 2020 08:18:17 +
From:Austin Group Bug Tracker
Message-ID: <8de7a2b24ecdb11ff3e05b4279ae5...@austingroupbugs.net>
| (I didn't compare the rest of
| your new PATH description with the current one to see what else you changed
Almost all the
hi All
Attached are the minutes from the Monday meeting
regards
Andrew
-
Minutes of the 4th May 2020 Teleconference Austin-1025 Page 1 of 1
Submitted by Andrew Josey, The Open Group. 6th May 2020
Attendees:
Nick Stoughton, USENIX, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22 OR
Don Cragun, IEEE PASC OR
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1341
==
Reported By:kre
Assigned To:
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1340
==
Reported By:shware_systems
Assigned To:
12 matches
Mail list logo
