Re: verbose testsuite output contains 1M newlines

2009-04-13 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Ralf Wildenhues on 11/23/2008 9:37 AM: > * Eric Blake wrote on Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 03:56:49PM CET: >> According to Ralf Wildenhues on 11/23/2008 6:23 AM: >>> running >>> make check-local TESTSUITEFLAGS=-v >>> >>> on M4 (git master) prod

Re: [Autotest] Prefixing commands launched by AT_CHECK

2009-04-13 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Thomas Moulard on 4/13/2009 6:00 AM: > About the "which" issue, Valgrind does not need an absolute path, it is just > that I used to rely on the fact that my binaries are always in my PATH. autotest can be made to guarantee that the binar

Re: [Autotest] Prefixing commands launched by AT_CHECK

2009-04-13 Thread Thomas Moulard
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > According to Thomas Moulard on 4/12/2009 8:01 PM: >> However, I still have an issue with the other scenario (MinGW >> cross-compiling): >> in that case, my binaries are suffixed with '.exe'. >

Re: [Autotest] Prefixing commands launched by AT_CHECK

2009-04-13 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Thomas Moulard on 4/12/2009 8:01 PM: > However, I still have an issue with the other scenario (MinGW > cross-compiling): > in that case, my binaries are suffixed with '.exe'. > > Is is easy to make Autotest aware of EXEEXT, however AT_TE

Re: [Autotest] Prefixing commands launched by AT_CHECK

2009-04-13 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Mike Frysinger on 4/13/2009 4:40 AM: >>> I just had to use "which" to force an absolute path as Valgrind does not >> "which" probably isn't guaranteed to appear on every platform that >> autoconf scripts might run on - ymmv > > nor is it

Re: [Autotest] Prefixing commands launched by AT_CHECK

2009-04-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 13 April 2009 06:03:05 Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Thomas Moulard wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > >> This is very doable. In fact, it is how the m4 testsuite allows the > >> user to specify an alternate $SED program [1]. You can use atloc

Re: [Autotest] Prefixing commands launched by AT_CHECK

2009-04-13 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Thomas Moulard wrote: On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Eric Blake wrote: This is very doable.  In fact, it is how the m4 testsuite allows the user to specify an alternate $SED program [1].  You can use atlocal.in to perform initialization of your $TESTSUITE_PREFIX before a