These files are maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED], I've added a CC:
to that.
/assar
Tomas Berndtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For the MiNT system, the lines in config.sub are wrong. It's missing
> the '*'-wildcard. I've applied a patch below.
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> Tomas
>
>
>
> --- /usr/
Derek R. Price writes:
> Basically, the issue is that the GNU coding standards state that the
> texinfo.tex you built your docs with should be included with a source
> distribution so that an end user is sure to be able to build your docs too.
you could try telling the automake people to get r
"Derek R. Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > Assuming I have a texinfo.tex & a pdftexinfo.tex, both in '.', is there
> > > some command that will allow 'texi2dvi foo.texi' and 'texi2dvi --pdf
> > > foo.texi' to each find the appropria
Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > Assuming I have a texinfo.tex & a pdftexinfo.tex, both in '.', is there
> > some command that will allow 'texi2dvi foo.texi' and 'texi2dvi --pdf
> > foo.texi' to each find the appropriate texinfo.tex?
> >
>
> surely the simpler answe
Is there a good reason the configure script creates
$(top_builddir)/.deps during the test that sets $DEPDIR and doesn't
delete it again? Besides some developer or other needing sleep? ;)
My distribution certainly doesn't seem to need that directory sitting
around...
Derek
--
Derek Price
For the MiNT system, the lines in config.sub are wrong. It's missing
the '*'-wildcard. I've applied a patch below.
Greetings,
Tomas
--- /usr/share/automake/config.sub~ Sat Sep 2 16:05:51 2000
+++ /usr/share/automake/config.sub Tue Dec 19 17:44:48 2000
@@ -985,7 +985,7 @@
-x
