Generate Custom Compiler / Build Rules?

Automake community: I would be very thankful for any advice on the following: I have an embedded platform for which I override all the make rules by writing the make rules by hand in Makefile.am. I have tested this out, and it works great, but because we have many unit tests, I have to copy a

Re: Dependency issues after adding new sources.

automake-bounces+xochitl_lunde=tripplite@gnu.org wrote on 09/11/2009 10:24:58 AM: > Please excuse my ignorance, but my search fu is weak, and I think the > authors of tfm are conspiring to bewilder me. I have read several tutorials > and discussions on how to use the autotools, but to be ho

Re: Generate Custom Compiler / Build Rules?

automake-bounces+xochitl_lunde=tripplite@gnu.org wrote on 09/13/2009 12:09:31 PM: > Hello Xochitl, > > * Xochitl Lunde wrote on Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:27:31PM CEST: > > I have an embedded platform for which I override all the make rules by > > writing the

Re: Generate Custom Compiler / Build Rules?

automake-bounces+xochitl_lunde=tripplite@gnu.org wrote on 09/14/2009 11:51:26 PM: > You can, even only as an intermediate step on the way to a unified > makefile, put code common to several makefile in a fragment: > > Xoch

Dependency tracking problem using "-l" to link libraries.

I have a problem with my dependency tracking in my auto tools build. I have a program like this for an embedded target: - pald_SOURCES = \ $(top_srcdir)/../common/src/pal/main.cpp if ac_netos_build pald_SOURCES+=trippUtils.cpp # From Makef

Re: Generate Custom Compiler / Build Rules?

Ralf Wildenhues wrote on 09/13/2009 12:09:31 PM: > Hello Xochitl, > > * Xochitl Lunde wrote on Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:27:31PM CEST: > > I have an embedded platform for which I override all the make rules by > > writing the make rules by hand in Makefile.am. I have teste

Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make

> > > But let me rephrase the critique in a poignant way: if you want to > > require GNU make anyway, what is your rational to not use quagmire > > instead of Automake? > > > You mean this? > > > Well, the fact that it took me ~ 3 minutes to find it with Goog

RE: PKG_CHECK_MODULES on system without pkg-config installed?

> This is not meant to sound like a troll, but: is anyone really > *really* using static linking in 2011? I use static linking every day for the embedded target.

RE: Problem with circular dependencies

>From: automake-bounces+xochitl_lunde=tripplite@gnu.org >[automake->bounces+xochitl_lunde=tripplite@gnu.org] on behalf of Jules >Colding [cold...@venalicium.dk] >Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 3:34 PM >To: Nate Bargmann >Cc: automake@gnu.org >Su